LGRRX vs. FBGRX

In the year-to-date period, LGRRX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than FBGRX's -3.61% return. Over the past 10 years, LGRRX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 15.49%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.86% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

LGRRX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current LGRRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRRX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

LGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than FBGRX's 6.17% yield.

The maximum LGRRX drawdown since its inception was -58.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -58.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRRX and FBGRX.

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) is 5.95%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 6.52%. This indicates that LGRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.