LSGGX vs. NEFOX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX).
LSGGX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Mar 30, 2016. NEFOX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on May 6, 1931.
Performance
LSGGX vs. NEFOX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSGGX vs. NEFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund | -16.35% | 16.84% | 23.30% | 36.10% | -25.98% | 5.89% | 35.25% | 30.63% | -6.70% | 31.11% |
NEFOX Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund | -4.12% | 14.77% | 15.71% | 30.96% | -13.02% | 33.94% | 13.08% | 26.76% | -13.01% | 19.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGGX achieves a -16.35% return, which is significantly lower than NEFOX's -4.12% return.
LSGGX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -9.84%
- YTD
- -16.35%
- 6M
- -18.90%
- 1Y
- 1.75%
- 3Y*
- 11.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- —
NEFOX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -4.12%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 8.71%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSGGX vs. NEFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than NEFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSGGX vs. NEFOX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGGX
NEFOX
LSGGX vs. NEFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSGGX | NEFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | 0.48 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.06 | 0.84 | -0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.11 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | 0.29 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 1.07 | -1.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSGGX | NEFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 0.48 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.60 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.36 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGGX and NEFOX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSGGX vs. NEFOX - Dividend Comparison
LSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than NEFOX's 7.45% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund | 0.36% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.77% | 7.38% | 6.15% | 5.74% | 4.78% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NEFOX Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund | 7.45% | 7.14% | 6.85% | 3.62% | 17.00% | 7.02% | 9.21% | 9.34% | 10.83% | 4.19% | 3.66% | 4.01% |
Drawdowns
LSGGX vs. NEFOX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGGX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum NEFOX drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGGX and NEFOX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGGX | NEFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -62.35% | +24.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.08% | -13.32% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -23.56% | -14.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.92% | -6.67% | -14.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.55% | -12.52% | +4.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.93% | 4.73% | +3.20% |
Volatility
LSGGX vs. NEFOX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Natixis Funds Trust II Oakmark Fund (NEFOX) at 4.07%. This indicates that LSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NEFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSGGX | NEFOX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.66% | 4.07% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.86% | 10.45% | +2.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 20.86% | +3.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.87% | 19.26% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 20.87% | -0.30% |