PortfoliosLab logo
LSGGX vs. SEEGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LSGGX and SEEGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

LSGGX vs. SEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LSGGX:

1.08

SEEGX:

0.62

Sortino Ratio

LSGGX:

1.48

SEEGX:

0.86

Omega Ratio

LSGGX:

1.20

SEEGX:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

LSGGX:

1.01

SEEGX:

0.58

Martin Ratio

LSGGX:

3.72

SEEGX:

1.87

Ulcer Index

LSGGX:

6.02%

SEEGX:

6.64%

Daily Std Dev

LSGGX:

23.08%

SEEGX:

24.11%

Max Drawdown

LSGGX:

-37.71%

SEEGX:

-63.03%

Current Drawdown

LSGGX:

-2.61%

SEEGX:

-4.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGGX achieves a 7.07% return, which is significantly higher than SEEGX's 0.19% return.


LSGGX

YTD

7.07%

1M

7.48%

6M

5.61%

1Y

24.16%

3Y*

19.73%

5Y*

13.24%

10Y*

N/A

SEEGX

YTD

0.19%

1M

6.25%

6M

-0.22%

1Y

15.07%

3Y*

19.24%

5Y*

16.91%

10Y*

16.66%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund

JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund

LSGGX vs. SEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSGGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SEEGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LSGGX vs. SEEGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LSGGX is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LSGGX is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LSGGX is 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LSGGX is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LSGGX is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LSGGX is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

SEEGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SEEGX is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SEEGX is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SEEGX is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SEEGX is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SEEGX is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SEEGX is 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LSGGX vs. SEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LSGGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the SEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGGX and SEEGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LSGGX vs. SEEGX - Dividend Comparison

LSGGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEEGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LSGGX
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%7.78%7.39%6.15%5.75%4.78%3.44%2.50%0.00%0.00%
SEEGX
JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund
1.00%1.00%0.12%3.42%14.92%5.27%12.85%15.97%14.79%9.88%4.49%1.79%

Drawdowns

LSGGX vs. SEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGGX drawdown since its inception was -37.71%, smaller than the maximum SEEGX drawdown of -63.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGGX and SEEGX.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LSGGX vs. SEEGX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) has a higher volatility of 5.28% compared to JPMorgan Large Cap Growth Fund (SEEGX) at 4.76%. This indicates that LSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...