LGRRX vs. ANEFX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LGRRX (Loomis Sayles Growth Fund) and ANEFX (American Funds The New Economy Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - LGRRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Natixis, while ANEFX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by American Funds. Over the past 10 years, LGRRX returned 14.79%/yr vs 15.58%/yr for ANEFX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LGRRX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for ANEFX.

Performance

LGRRX vs. ANEFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class A (ANEFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGRRX achieves a -6.55% return, which is significantly lower than ANEFX's 14.11% return. Over the past 10 years, LGRRX has underperformed ANEFX with an annualized return of 14.79%, while ANEFX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.58% annualized return.

LGRRX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -2.48%
• 6M: -5.97%
• YTD: -6.55%
• 1Y: -1.92%
• 3Y*: 14.49%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 14.79%
• ALL TIME*: 7.90%

ANEFX

• 1D: 3.59%
• 1M: -4.66%
• 6M: 10.11%
• YTD: 14.11%
• 1Y: 35.83%
• 3Y*: 24.98%
• 5Y*: 11.75%
• 10Y*: 15.58%
• ALL TIME*: 13.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ANEFX American Funds The New Economy Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LGRRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LGRRX vs. ANEFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LGRRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	-6.55%	13.76%	34.82%	50.89%	-28.03%	18.40%	31.40%	31.41%	-2.80%	32.29%
ANEFX American Funds The New Economy Fund Class A	14.11%	31.01%	23.58%	29.14%	-29.67%	12.85%	33.47%	26.46%	-4.36%	34.37%

Correlation

The correlation between LGRRX and ANEFX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1996	0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between LGRRX and ANEFX has dropped to 0.63 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LGRRX vs. ANEFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LGRRX

LGRRX Risk / Return Rank: 3
LGRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LGRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LGRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LGRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
LGRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ANEFX

ANEFX Risk / Return Rank: 72
ANEFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
ANEFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
ANEFX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
ANEFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
ANEFX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LGRRX vs. ANEFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) and American Funds The New Economy Fund Class A (ANEFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LGRRX	ANEFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.14	1.63	-1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.06	2.18	-2.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.28	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.14	2.49	-2.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	9.23	-9.59

LGRRX vs. ANEFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGRRX Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the ANEFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGRRX and ANEFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LGRRX vs. ANEFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGRRX drawdown since its inception was -64.70%, which is greater than ANEFX's maximum drawdown of -61.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGRRX and ANEFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LGRRX	ANEFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.70%	-61.28%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.93%	-13.35%	-4.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.84%	-20.82%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.85%	-36.63%	+1.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.85%	-36.63%	+1.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.70%	-7.98%	-1.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.16%	-11.41%	-9.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.41%	3.59%	+2.82%

Volatility

LGRRX vs. ANEFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Growth Fund (LGRRX) is 5.35%, while American Funds The New Economy Fund Class A (ANEFX) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that LGRRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANEFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LGRRX	ANEFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.35%	7.56%	-2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.83%	17.18%	-3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.14%	20.42%	-2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.12%	20.01%	+3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.10%	19.33%	+1.77%

LGRRX vs. ANEFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGRRX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than ANEFX's 0.72% expense ratio.

Dividends

LGRRX vs. ANEFX - Dividend Comparison

LGRRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, less than ANEFX's 8.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANEFX American Funds The New Economy Fund Class A	8.70%	9.93%	9.59%	3.96%	0.00%	8.24%	2.47%	7.34%	10.00%	8.28%	4.61%	6.16%
LGRRX Loomis Sayles Growth Fund	2.68%	2.50%	6.30%	6.70%	18.14%	5.13%	4.60%	2.68%	5.92%	2.33%	1.38%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LGRRX and ANEFX in my portfolio?

LGRRX and ANEFX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LGRRX or ANEFX?

ANEFX has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to LGRRX (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGRRX dropped -64.70% vs ANEFX's -61.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANEFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.