PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGLV vs. VRVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGLV vs. VRVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than VRVIX's 14.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LGLV having a 11.00% annualized return and VRVIX not far ahead at 11.31%.


LGLV

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.07%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
11.00%

VRVIX

1D
0.79%
1M
4.27%
YTD
14.28%
6M
14.88%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
11.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGLV vs. VRVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
0.83%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%30.83%0.32%17.84%
VRVIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
14.28%15.31%14.32%11.41%-7.64%25.09%2.75%26.49%-8.30%13.58%

Correlation

The correlation between LGLV and VRVIX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2013

0.80

The correlation between LGLV and VRVIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.87 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGLV vs. VRVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VRVIX
VRVIX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VRVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VRVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLV vs. VRVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGLVVRVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.49

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

4.29

-3.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

17.97

-16.90

LGLV vs. VRVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the VRVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLV and VRVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGLVVRVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

2.70

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.70

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.65

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.71

+0.06

Drawdowns

LGLV vs. VRVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, roughly equal to the maximum VRVIX drawdown of -38.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and VRVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGLVVRVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.64%

-38.29%

+1.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-6.80%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.17%

-16.00%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

-19.06%

+1.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

-38.29%

+1.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.60%

0.00%

-6.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-3.92%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

1.62%

+1.05%

Volatility

LGLV vs. VRVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 2.42%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX) has a volatility of 3.06%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGLVVRVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

3.06%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

8.18%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

10.82%

-1.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

14.84%

-1.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

17.35%

-1.29%

LGLV vs. VRVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VRVIX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGLV vs. VRVIX - Dividend Comparison

LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than VRVIX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.04%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
VRVIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.64%1.41%1.98%2.10%2.24%1.69%2.25%2.30%2.60%2.21%2.43%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGLV and VRVIX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRVIX has higher volatility (3.06%) compared to LGLV (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLV dropped -36.64% vs VRVIX's -38.29%.

VRVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGLV and VRVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer