PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRVIX vs. VRGWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRVIX vs. VRGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRVIX achieves a 16.67% return, which is significantly higher than VRGWX's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VRVIX has underperformed VRGWX with an annualized return of 11.80%, while VRGWX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.03% annualized return.


VRVIX

1D
0.55%
1M
3.40%
YTD
16.67%
6M
15.93%
1Y
29.73%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
11.30%
10Y*
11.80%

VRGWX

1D
-1.27%
1M
-2.48%
YTD
3.17%
6M
1.85%
1Y
19.93%
3Y*
22.50%
5Y*
14.38%
10Y*
19.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRVIX vs. VRGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRVIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
16.67%15.31%14.32%11.41%-7.64%25.09%2.75%26.49%-8.30%13.58%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
3.17%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VRVIX and VRGWX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between VRVIX and VRGWX has dropped to 0.55 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRVIX vs. VRGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRVIX
VRVIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
VRVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VRVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRVIX vs. VRGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRVIXVRGWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.23

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

1.32

+3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.88

4.32

+14.56

VRVIX vs. VRGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the VRGWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRVIX and VRGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRVIX vs. VRGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRVIX drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than VRGWX's maximum drawdown of -32.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRVIX and VRGWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRVIXVRGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-32.70%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-16.19%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-23.44%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-32.70%

+13.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

-32.70%

-5.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-5.34%

+5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-4.87%

+0.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

4.93%

-3.30%

Volatility

VRVIX vs. VRGWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX) is 3.96%, while Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that VRVIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRVIXVRGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

5.95%

-1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.68%

12.63%

-3.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

16.22%

-4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

21.74%

-6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.38%

21.23%

-3.85%

VRVIX vs. VRGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VRVIX and VRGWX have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRVIX vs. VRGWX - Dividend Comparison

VRVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, more than VRGWX's 0.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.47%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%
VRVIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.62%1.41%1.98%2.10%2.24%1.69%2.25%2.30%2.60%2.21%2.43%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRVIX and VRGWX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRGWX has higher volatility (5.95%) compared to VRVIX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRVIX dropped -38.29% vs VRGWX's -32.70%.

VRVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRVIX and VRGWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer