PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRVIX vs. USMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRVIX vs. USMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRVIX achieves a 20.09% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, VRVIX has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 11.52%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.


VRVIX

1D
0.49%
1M
1.49%
6M
14.86%
YTD
20.09%
1Y
32.24%
3Y*
17.48%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
11.52%
ALL TIME*
12.06%

USMV

1D
0.09%
1M
0.04%
6M
3.84%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
11.04%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
9.63%
ALL TIME*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$217.70M$221.64M$218.77M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VRVIX vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRVIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
20.09%15.31%14.32%11.41%-7.64%25.09%2.75%26.49%-8.30%13.58%
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
4.76%7.65%15.74%10.33%-9.43%20.85%5.64%27.69%1.33%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VRVIX and USMV is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.82

The correlation between VRVIX and USMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRVIX vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRVIX
VRVIX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VRVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VRVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

USMV
USMV Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
USMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMV Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
USMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMV Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRVIX vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VRVIXUSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.15

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

1.15

+3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.59

3.74

+14.86

VRVIX vs. USMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRVIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the USMV Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRVIX and USMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VRVIX vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRVIX drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRVIX and USMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRVIXUSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-33.10%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.80%

-6.46%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.00%

-9.36%

-6.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-17.93%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.29%

-33.10%

-5.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.64%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-2.86%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

1.98%

-0.38%

Volatility

VRVIX vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRVIX) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) have volatilities of 2.91% and 2.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRVIXUSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

2.80%

+0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.74%

6.44%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.43%

8.56%

+2.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

12.38%

+2.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.31%

14.50%

+2.81%

VRVIX vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRVIX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRVIX vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison

VRVIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, more than USMV's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USMV
iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF
1.47%1.49%1.67%1.82%1.62%1.26%1.81%1.88%2.12%1.77%2.22%2.02%
VRVIX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Value Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.57%1.41%1.98%2.10%2.24%1.69%2.25%2.30%2.60%2.21%2.43%2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRVIX and USMV have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRVIX has higher volatility (2.91%) compared to USMV (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRVIX dropped -38.29% vs USMV's -33.10%.

VRVIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRVIX and USMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer