PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGLV vs. USVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGLV vs. USVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 15.26% return.


LGLV

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.07%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
11.00%

USVM

1D
-0.40%
1M
2.60%
YTD
15.26%
6M
15.00%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
19.79%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGLV vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
0.83%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%30.83%0.32%2.61%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
15.26%10.56%16.59%18.90%-13.23%24.44%11.56%21.65%-9.39%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between LGLV and USVM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.73

The correlation between LGLV and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

LGLV vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGLV
USVM

Industrials

18.4%
12.1%

Real Estate

17.4%
11.9%

Utilities

11.8%
6.4%

Financial Services

9.9%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
11.1%

Technology

8.8%
11.6%

Healthcare

7.0%
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
5.0%

Communication Services

4.2%
2.8%

Energy

3.7%
4.4%

Basic Materials

3.5%
1.8%

Industrials

LGLV
18.4%
USVM
12.1%

Real Estate

LGLV
17.4%
USVM
11.9%

Utilities

LGLV
11.8%
USVM
6.4%

Financial Services

LGLV
9.9%
USVM
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LGLV
9.4%
USVM
11.1%

Technology

LGLV
8.8%
USVM
11.6%

Healthcare

LGLV
7.0%
USVM
11.0%

Consumer Defensive

LGLV
5.9%
USVM
5.0%

Communication Services

LGLV
4.2%
USVM
2.8%

Energy

LGLV
3.7%
USVM
4.4%

Basic Materials

LGLV
3.5%
USVM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGLV vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

USVM
USVM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
USVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
USVM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
USVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
USVM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLV vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGLVUSVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.36

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

3.66

-3.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

13.76

-12.69

LGLV vs. USVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LGLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.31, which is lower than the USVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LGLV and USVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGLVUSVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

2.05

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.50

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.49

+0.28

Drawdowns

LGLV vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum USVM drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and USVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGLVUSVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.64%

-42.38%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

-8.36%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.17%

-24.34%

+14.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

-25.27%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.60%

-0.57%

-6.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-7.90%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

2.22%

+0.45%

Volatility

LGLV vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 2.42%, while VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGLVUSVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

4.50%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

10.73%

-4.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

14.93%

-5.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

19.65%

-6.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

22.01%

-5.95%

LGLV vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

LGLV vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison

LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than USVM's 1.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.04%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
USVM
VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF
1.76%1.84%1.75%1.63%1.43%0.70%1.21%1.77%1.43%0.65%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGLV and USVM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USVM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to LGLV (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLV dropped -36.64% vs USVM's -42.38%.

On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 7.70% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.76% for USVM.

LGLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while USVM is Momentum. LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR), while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGLV and 0.29% for USVM.

USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGLV and USVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer