LGLV vs. USVM
LGLV (SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LGLV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR), while USVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LGLV returned 7.70%/yr vs 9.74%/yr for USVM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LGLV charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
LGLV vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LGLV achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 15.26% return.
LGLV
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 0.83%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 11.00%
USVM
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- 15.26%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.42%
- 3Y*
- 19.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- —
LGLV vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 0.83% | 8.37% | 16.22% | 9.19% | -8.17% | 27.95% | 7.42% | 30.83% | 0.32% | 2.61% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 15.26% | 10.56% | 16.59% | 18.90% | -13.23% | 24.44% | 11.56% | 21.65% | -9.39% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between LGLV and USVM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between LGLV and USVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
LGLV vs. USVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LGLV
USVM
Industrials
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
LGLV
USVM
Real Estate
LGLV
USVM
Utilities
LGLV
USVM
Financial Services
LGLV
USVM
Consumer Cyclical
LGLV
USVM
Technology
LGLV
USVM
Healthcare
LGLV
USVM
Consumer Defensive
LGLV
USVM
Communication Services
LGLV
USVM
Energy
LGLV
USVM
Basic Materials
LGLV
USVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LGLV vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
LGLV
USVM
LGLV vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LGLV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.31 | 2.05 | -1.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.51 | 2.98 | -2.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.36 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.42 | 3.66 | -3.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 13.76 | -12.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LGLV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 | 2.05 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.50 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.49 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
LGLV vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LGLV drawdown since its inception was -36.64%, smaller than the maximum USVM drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LGLV and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LGLV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.64% | -42.38% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.86% | -8.36% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.17% | -24.34% | +14.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.49% | -25.27% | +7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.60% | -0.57% | -6.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.21% | -7.90% | +4.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 2.22% | +0.45% |
Volatility
LGLV vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) is 2.42%, while VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that LGLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LGLV | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 4.50% | -2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.52% | 10.73% | -4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.20% | 14.93% | -5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.91% | 19.65% | -6.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.06% | 22.01% | -5.95% |
LGLV vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LGLV vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than USVM's 1.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGLV SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF | 2.04% | 1.94% | 1.93% | 2.03% | 1.95% | 1.65% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.09% | 4.39% | 2.54% | 2.97% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.76% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LGLV and USVM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USVM has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to LGLV (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LGLV dropped -36.64% vs USVM's -42.38%.
On 5-year performance, USVM leads with 9.74% vs 7.70% for LGLV. On fees, LGLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, LGLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, USVM has performed better with a 9.74% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LGLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USVM.
LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.76% for USVM.
LGLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while USVM is Momentum. LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR), while USVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGLV and 0.29% for USVM.
USVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LGLV and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer