PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LGLV vs. SPMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LGLV vs. SPMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LGLV

1D
-0.06%
1M
-1.79%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.07%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
11.07%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
11.00%

SPMV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LGLV vs. SPMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
0.83%8.37%16.22%9.19%-8.17%27.95%7.42%30.83%0.32%7.81%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between LGLV and SPMV is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2017

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between LGLV and SPMV has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LGLV vs. SPMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LGLV
SPMV

Industrials

18.4%
6.0%

Real Estate

17.4%
0.2%

Utilities

11.8%
2.8%

Financial Services

9.9%
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.4%
6.6%

Technology

8.8%
26.9%

Healthcare

7.0%
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
10.7%

Communication Services

4.2%
6.5%

Energy

3.7%
4.8%

Basic Materials

3.5%
2.6%

Industrials

LGLV
18.4%
SPMV
6.0%

Real Estate

LGLV
17.4%
SPMV
0.2%

Utilities

LGLV
11.8%
SPMV
2.8%

Financial Services

LGLV
9.9%
SPMV
17.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LGLV
9.4%
SPMV
6.6%

Technology

LGLV
8.8%
SPMV
26.9%

Healthcare

LGLV
7.0%
SPMV
15.0%

Consumer Defensive

LGLV
5.9%
SPMV
10.7%

Communication Services

LGLV
4.2%
SPMV
6.5%

Energy

LGLV
3.7%
SPMV
4.8%

Basic Materials

LGLV
3.5%
SPMV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LGLV vs. SPMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LGLV
LGLV Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LGLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGLV Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
LGLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGLV Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LGLV vs. SPMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (LGLV) and Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LGLVSPMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

LGLV vs. SPMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LGLVSPMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

Drawdowns

LGLV vs. SPMV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LGLVSPMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

Volatility

LGLV vs. SPMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LGLVSPMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.06%

LGLV vs. SPMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

LGLV has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMV's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LGLV vs. SPMV - Dividend Comparison

LGLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than SPMV's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGLV
SPDR SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.04%1.94%1.93%2.03%1.95%1.65%1.98%1.89%2.09%4.39%2.54%2.97%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.45%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LGLV and SPMV have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPMV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPMV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for LGLV.

LGLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 1.45% for SPMV.

LGLV is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SPMV is S&P 500. LGLV tracks SSGA US Large Cap Low Volatility (TR), while SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for LGLV and 0.10% for SPMV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LGLV and SPMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer