PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SPMV vs. MGV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SPMV vs. MGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SPMV

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MGV

1D
-0.82%
1M
3.65%
YTD
15.89%
6M
15.48%
1Y
28.43%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
12.99%
10Y*
13.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SPMV vs. MGV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
0.87%11.69%18.78%10.28%-10.84%24.35%8.57%32.13%-6.28%7.84%
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
15.89%15.45%16.94%9.16%-1.22%25.93%2.50%25.54%-4.13%11.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SPMV and MGV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.75

The correlation between SPMV and MGV shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SPMV vs. MGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SPMV
MGV

Technology

26.9%
18.5%

Financial Services

17.8%
22.8%

Healthcare

15.0%
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

10.7%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
3.4%

Communication Services

6.5%
3.2%

Industrials

6.0%
13.2%

Energy

4.8%
6.0%

Utilities

2.8%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.2%

Technology

SPMV
26.9%
MGV
18.5%

Financial Services

SPMV
17.8%
MGV
22.8%

Healthcare

SPMV
15.0%
MGV
16.0%

Consumer Defensive

SPMV
10.7%
MGV
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

SPMV
6.6%
MGV
3.4%

Communication Services

SPMV
6.5%
MGV
3.2%

Industrials

SPMV
6.0%
MGV
13.2%

Energy

SPMV
4.8%
MGV
6.0%

Utilities

SPMV
2.8%
MGV
2.3%

Basic Materials

SPMV
2.6%
MGV
2.3%

Real Estate

SPMV
0.2%
MGV
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SPMV vs. MGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SPMV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MGV
MGV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SPMV vs. MGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF (SPMV) and Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF (MGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SPMVMGVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.89

SPMV vs. MGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SPMV vs. MGV - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SPMVMGVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

Volatility

SPMV vs. MGV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SPMVMGVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.32%

SPMV vs. MGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

SPMV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MGV's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SPMV vs. MGV - Dividend Comparison

SPMV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGV
Vanguard Mega Cap Value ETF
1.84%2.04%2.31%2.48%2.45%2.17%2.47%2.69%2.65%2.34%2.53%2.59%
SPMV
Invesco S&P 500 Minimum Variance ETF
1.05%1.53%1.53%2.28%1.79%1.28%1.71%3.13%2.11%1.72%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SPMV and MGV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MGV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MGV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for SPMV.

MGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.84%, compared with 1.05% for SPMV.

SPMV is categorized as S&P 500, while MGV is Large Cap Value Equities. SPMV tracks S&P 500 Minimum Volatility Index, while MGV tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for SPMV and 0.05% for MGV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SPMV and MGV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer