ELMD vs. EAT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ELMD (Electromed, Inc.) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. ELMD operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, ELMD returned 23.08%/yr vs 13.45%/yr for EAT. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ELMD vs. EAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ELMD achieves a 22.42% return, which is significantly higher than EAT's -2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, ELMD has outperformed EAT with an annualized return of 23.08%, while EAT has yielded a comparatively lower 13.45% annualized return.

ELMD

• 1D: -2.54%
• 1M: 39.48%
• YTD: 22.42%
• 6M: 27.55%
• 1Y: 74.07%
• 3Y*: 44.52%
• 5Y*: 26.65%
• 10Y*: 23.08%

EAT

• 1D: 1.49%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: -2.27%
• 6M: -1.27%
• 1Y: -19.09%
• 3Y*: 52.02%
• 5Y*: 19.93%
• 10Y*: 13.45%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ELMD vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ELMD Electromed, Inc.	22.42%	-1.46%	170.85%	4.00%	-19.31%	32.52%	13.41%	69.94%	-16.14%	56.44%
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	-2.27%	8.49%	206.37%	35.32%	-12.79%	-35.32%	36.16%	-0.92%	17.27%	-18.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ELMD and EAT is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.09
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 16, 2010	0.08

Fundamentals

Market Cap ELMD : $308.29M EAT : $6.24B
EPS ELMD : $1.16 EAT : $10.14
PE Ratio ELMD : 30.64 EAT : 13.83
PEG Ratio ELMD : 0.84 EAT : 0.32
PS Ratio ELMD : 4.31 EAT : 1.12
PB Ratio ELMD : 6.27 EAT : 15.37
Total Revenue (TTM) ELMD : $71.75M EAT : $5.73B
Gross Profit (TTM) ELMD : $56.28M EAT : $3.45B
EBITDA (TTM) ELMD : $14.10M EAT : $807.20M

Return for Risk

ELMD vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ELMD

ELMD Risk / Return Rank: 80
ELMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
ELMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
ELMD Omega Ratio Rank: 78
ELMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
ELMD Martin Ratio Rank: 79

EAT

EAT Risk / Return Rank: 23
EAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
EAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
EAT Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EAT Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ELMD vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ELMD	EAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	-0.41	+1.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.27	-0.34	+2.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.96	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	-0.43	+3.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.48	-0.89	+7.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ELMD vs. EAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ELMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the EAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ELMD and EAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ELMD	EAT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.41	-0.41	+1.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.41	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.25	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.22	0.28	-0.06

Drawdowns

ELMD vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ELMD drawdown since its inception was -78.65%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -88.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ELMD and EAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	ELMD	EAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.65%	-88.40%	+9.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.27%	-44.41%	+21.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-48.86%	-45.92%	-2.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.86%	-65.73%	+16.87%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.84%	-84.94%	+29.10%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.26%	-25.84%	+16.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.81%	-24.34%	-9.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.47%	21.52%	-10.05%

Volatility

ELMD vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison

Electromed, Inc. (ELMD) has a higher volatility of 26.12% compared to Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) at 16.02%. This indicates that ELMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ELMD	EAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	26.12%	16.02%	+10.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.30%	35.41%	+1.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.78%	46.21%	+6.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.31%	49.06%	-2.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.01%	55.07%	-2.06%

Dividends

ELMD vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither ELMD nor EAT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAT Brinker International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	3.62%	3.46%	3.71%	2.67%	2.50%
ELMD Electromed, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

ELMD vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Electromed, Inc. and Brinker International, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ELMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 18.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.8%.

EAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.

ELMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.77M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

EAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

ELMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Electromed, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00M and revenue of 18.58M, resulting in a net margin of 16.2%.

EAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ELMD and EAT in my portfolio?

ELMD and EAT have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ELMD or EAT?

ELMD has higher volatility (26.12%) compared to EAT (16.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ELMD dropped -78.65% vs EAT's -88.40%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ELMD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.