LFT vs. GS
Compare and contrast key facts about Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS).
Performance
LFT vs. GS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LFT vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFT Lument Finance Trust, Inc. | -7.76% | -39.33% | 29.40% | 38.64% | -45.07% | 28.63% | 15.69% | 23.31% | -22.06% | -9.69% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | -3.25% | 56.64% | 52.03% | 15.91% | -7.87% | 47.61% | 17.45% | 40.48% | -33.53% | 7.73% |
Fundamentals
LFT:
$65.95M
GS:
$268.69B
LFT:
-$0.14
GS:
$54.19
LFT:
1.08
GS:
2.14
LFT:
0.41
GS:
2.15
LFT:
$61.31M
GS:
$125.10B
LFT:
$42.55M
GS:
$57.17B
LFT:
$47.24M
GS:
$21.81B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFT achieves a -7.76% return, which is significantly lower than GS's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LFT has underperformed GS with an annualized return of -1.05%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.
LFT
- 1D
- 1.61%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -7.76%
- 6M
- -33.77%
- 1Y
- -46.33%
- 3Y*
- -2.85%
- 5Y*
- -8.46%
- 10Y*
- -1.05%
GS
- 1D
- 4.75%
- 1M
- -1.06%
- YTD
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 58.07%
- 3Y*
- 40.67%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 20.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFT vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank
LFT
GS
LFT vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFT | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | 1.82 | -2.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.46 | 2.35 | -3.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.33 | -0.51 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.89 | 3.04 | -3.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.48 | 9.70 | -11.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFT | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.98 | 1.82 | -2.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.87 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.03 | 0.70 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.12 | 0.31 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between LFT and GS is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LFT vs. GS - Dividend Comparison
LFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%, more than GS's 1.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFT Lument Finance Trust, Inc. | 14.29% | 15.60% | 15.50% | 11.16% | 12.63% | 9.38% | 11.16% | 9.13% | 9.79% | 13.75% | 41.20% | 24.73% |
GS The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | 1.83% | 1.59% | 2.01% | 2.72% | 2.62% | 1.70% | 1.90% | 1.80% | 1.89% | 1.14% | 1.09% | 1.41% |
Drawdowns
LFT vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFT drawdown since its inception was -81.57%, roughly equal to the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFT and GS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFT | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.57% | -78.84% | -2.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.73% | -19.42% | -32.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.40% | -32.84% | -22.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.00% | -48.75% | -28.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.14% | -12.85% | -38.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.64% | -22.75% | -9.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.23% | 6.08% | +25.15% |
Volatility
LFT vs. GS - Volatility Comparison
Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) has a higher volatility of 19.49% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 9.44%. This indicates that LFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LFT | GS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.49% | 9.44% | +10.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.09% | 21.70% | +16.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.28% | 32.11% | +15.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.70% | 27.68% | +7.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.41% | 29.71% | +11.70% |
Financials
LFT vs. GS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lument Finance Trust, Inc. and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities