PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LFT vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LFT and VOO is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.2

Performance

LFT vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
20.14%
7.47%
LFT
VOO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LFT:

1.30

VOO:

1.76

Sortino Ratio

LFT:

1.90

VOO:

2.37

Omega Ratio

LFT:

1.25

VOO:

1.32

Calmar Ratio

LFT:

1.19

VOO:

2.66

Martin Ratio

LFT:

9.08

VOO:

11.10

Ulcer Index

LFT:

4.67%

VOO:

2.02%

Daily Std Dev

LFT:

32.77%

VOO:

12.79%

Max Drawdown

LFT:

-81.39%

VOO:

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

LFT:

-6.74%

VOO:

-2.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFT achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LFT has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 0.30%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.03% annualized return.


LFT

YTD

5.81%

1M

5.41%

6M

20.13%

1Y

41.79%

5Y*

8.54%

10Y*

0.30%

VOO

YTD

2.40%

1M

-1.05%

6M

7.47%

1Y

19.81%

5Y*

14.27%

10Y*

13.03%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LFT vs. VOO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LFT is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LFT is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LFT is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LFT is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LFT is 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LFT is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of VOO is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of VOO is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of VOO is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of VOO is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of VOO is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of VOO is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LFT vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LFT, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.301.76
The chart of Sortino ratio for LFT, currently valued at 1.90, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.902.37
The chart of Omega ratio for LFT, currently valued at 1.25, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.251.32
The chart of Calmar ratio for LFT, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.192.66
The chart of Martin ratio for LFT, currently valued at 9.08, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.009.0811.10
LFT
VOO

The current LFT Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFT and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.30
1.76
LFT
VOO

Dividends

LFT vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.65%, more than VOO's 1.22% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
14.65%15.50%11.16%12.63%9.38%11.16%9.13%9.76%15.00%41.21%24.73%13.89%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.22%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%

Drawdowns

LFT vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFT drawdown since its inception was -81.39%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFT and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-6.74%
-2.11%
LFT
VOO

Volatility

LFT vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) has a higher volatility of 4.79% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.38%. This indicates that LFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.79%
3.38%
LFT
VOO
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab