PortfoliosLab logo
LFT vs. GOOD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LFT and GOOD is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LFT vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LFT:

0.49

GOOD:

0.45

Sortino Ratio

LFT:

0.84

GOOD:

0.85

Omega Ratio

LFT:

1.11

GOOD:

1.10

Calmar Ratio

LFT:

0.49

GOOD:

0.31

Martin Ratio

LFT:

3.02

GOOD:

1.15

Ulcer Index

LFT:

4.91%

GOOD:

9.05%

Daily Std Dev

LFT:

33.32%

GOOD:

20.84%

Max Drawdown

LFT:

-81.39%

GOOD:

-67.22%

Current Drawdown

LFT:

-12.32%

GOOD:

-26.04%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LFT:

$130.29M

GOOD:

$667.49M

EPS

LFT:

$0.20

GOOD:

$0.30

PE Ratio

LFT:

12.45

GOOD:

47.83

PS Ratio

LFT:

4.81

GOOD:

4.42

PB Ratio

LFT:

0.75

GOOD:

3.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

LFT:

$46.78M

GOOD:

$151.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LFT:

$32.20M

GOOD:

$118.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

LFT:

$60.66M

GOOD:

$118.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFT achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly higher than GOOD's -8.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LFT has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 0.23%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.40% annualized return.


LFT

YTD

-0.52%

1M

-6.39%

6M

3.68%

1Y

16.68%

3Y*

12.77%

5Y*

14.58%

10Y*

0.23%

GOOD

YTD

-8.64%

1M

3.08%

6M

-15.22%

1Y

7.90%

3Y*

-2.99%

5Y*

3.66%

10Y*

6.40%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Lument Finance Trust, Inc.

Gladstone Commercial Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LFT vs. GOOD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LFT is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LFT is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LFT is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LFT is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LFT is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LFT is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOOD is 6363
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LFT vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LFT Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the GOOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFT and GOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LFT vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison

LFT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.47%, more than GOOD's 8.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LFT
Lument Finance Trust, Inc.
16.47%15.50%11.16%12.63%9.38%11.16%9.13%9.76%15.00%41.21%24.73%13.89%
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
8.36%7.39%9.06%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%8.74%

Drawdowns

LFT vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFT drawdown since its inception was -81.39%, which is greater than GOOD's maximum drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFT and GOOD.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LFT vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison

Lument Finance Trust, Inc. (LFT) has a higher volatility of 12.49% compared to Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) at 5.89%. This indicates that LFT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LFT vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lument Finance Trust, Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00M20.00M30.00M40.00M20212022202320242025
22.37M
37.50M
(LFT) Total Revenue
(GOOD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LFT vs. GOOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lument Finance Trust, Inc. and Gladstone Commercial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
34.9%
77.4%
(LFT) Gross Margin
(GOOD) Gross Margin
LFT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lument Finance Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.80M and revenue of 22.37M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.9%.

GOOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 29.03M and revenue of 37.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.

LFT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lument Finance Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of -491.50K and revenue of 22.37M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.2%.

GOOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 13.64M and revenue of 37.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

LFT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Lument Finance Trust, Inc. reported a net income of -522.57K and revenue of 22.37M, resulting in a net margin of -2.3%.

GOOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 5.13M and revenue of 37.50M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.