LFGY vs. QRMI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI).

LFGY and QRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LFGY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jan 13, 2025. QRMI is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.

Performance

LFGY vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LFGY vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	-7.99%	-8.18%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	-2.50%	4.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a -7.99% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's -2.50% return.

LFGY

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -3.25%
• YTD: -7.99%
• 6M: -24.51%
• 1Y: 6.09%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QRMI

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.37%
• YTD: -2.50%
• 6M: 1.31%
• 1Y: 2.76%
• 3Y*: 6.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFGY vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QRMI's 0.60% expense ratio.

LFGY

YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF

QRMI

Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF

Return for Risk

LFGY vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 17
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 17

QRMI

QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 21
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 20
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFGY vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFGY	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	0.36	-0.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.50	0.55	-0.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.08	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	0.55	-0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.72	1.59	-0.87
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFGY vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and QRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFGY	QRMI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	0.36	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.31	0.09	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and QRMI is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LFGY vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 106.59%, more than QRMI's 12.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	106.59%	94.90%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF	12.66%	12.28%	11.80%	12.44%	10.65%	3.36%

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and QRMI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFGY	QRMI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.94%	-20.95%	-14.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.94%	-5.04%	-30.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.72%	-3.54%	-26.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.03%	-8.25%	-5.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.17%	1.74%	+13.43%

Volatility

LFGY vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) has a higher volatility of 14.92% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 3.02%. This indicates that LFGY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFGY	QRMI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.92%	3.02%	+11.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.83%	4.93%	+25.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.15%	7.77%	+32.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.68%	8.46%	+34.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.68%	8.46%	+34.22%