LFGY vs. AMDW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

LFGY (YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LFGY returned -0.86% vs 209.29% for AMDW. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LFGY charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

LFGY vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFGY achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 146.74% return.

LFGY

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.38%
• 6M: 5.38%
• YTD: 6.34%
• 1Y: -0.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -2.36%

AMDW

• 1D: -2.02%
• 1M: -10.13%
• 6M: 119.90%
• YTD: 146.74%
• 1Y: 209.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 229.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	$10.26M	$9.58M	$8.51M
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	$957.02K	$905.59K	$1.33M

LFGY vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	6.34%	-15.04%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	146.74%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between LFGY and AMDW is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.56

The correlation between LFGY and AMDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFGY vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LFGY	AMDW
Financial Services	55.3%	-
Technology	34.1%	19.3%
Communication Services	6.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LFGY vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LFGY

LFGY Risk / Return Rank: 9
LFGY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
LFGY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
LFGY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
LFGY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
LFGY Martin Ratio Rank: 8

AMDW

AMDW Risk / Return Rank: 88
AMDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
AMDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
AMDW Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMDW Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LFGY vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LFGY	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	2.36	-2.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.07	2.92	-2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.36	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	5.83	-6.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.36	11.47	-11.83

LFGY vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFGY Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the AMDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFGY and AMDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LFGY vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFGY drawdown since its inception was -35.94%, roughly equal to the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFGY and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFGY	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.94%	-34.64%	-1.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.94%	-34.64%	-1.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.77%	-21.39%	+2.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.12%	-13.97%	-0.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.27%	17.59%	-0.32%

Volatility

LFGY vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF (LFGY) is 14.26%, while Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) has a volatility of 28.87%. This indicates that LFGY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFGY	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.26%	28.87%	-14.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.33%	67.40%	-34.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.62%	85.70%	-45.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.60%	85.05%	-42.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.60%	85.05%	-42.45%

LFGY vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFGY has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFGY vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

LFGY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 85.75%, more than AMDW's 53.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	53.42%	34.78%
LFGY YieldMax Crypto Industry & Tech Portfolio Option Income ETF	85.75%	94.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFGY and AMDW in my portfolio?

LFGY and AMDW have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LFGY or AMDW?

AMDW has higher volatility (28.87%) compared to LFGY (14.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFGY dropped -35.94% vs AMDW's -34.64%.

Which ETF is better, LFGY or AMDW?

On 1-year performance, AMDW leads with 209.29% vs -0.86% for LFGY. On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, LFGY has been the lower-risk option at 14.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LFGY or AMDW?

Over the 1-year period, AMDW has performed better with a 209.29% return vs -0.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFGY or AMDW?

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for LFGY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFGY or AMDW?

LFGY has the higher dividend yield at 85.75%, compared with 53.42% for AMDW.

What is the main difference between LFGY and AMDW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for LFGY and 0.99% for AMDW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.