LFEQ vs. IQM
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM).
LFEQ and IQM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LFEQ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD. It was launched on Oct 4, 2017. IQM is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020.
Performance
LFEQ vs. IQM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LFEQ vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | -3.84% | 10.49% | 24.30% | 19.66% | -22.05% | 27.97% | 26.49% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 3.20% | 30.76% | 31.03% | 41.06% | -33.36% | 25.18% | 78.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a -3.84% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 3.20% return.
LFEQ
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -4.43%
- YTD
- -3.84%
- 6M
- -1.58%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 14.16%
- 5Y*
- 8.01%
- 10Y*
- —
IQM
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- 57.05%
- 3Y*
- 26.96%
- 5Y*
- 15.40%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LFEQ vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LFEQ vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank
LFEQ
IQM
LFEQ vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFEQ | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.72 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.00 | 2.33 | -1.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.90 | 4.00 | -3.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.16 | 12.47 | -8.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFEQ | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.72 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.54 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.78 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between LFEQ and IQM is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LFEQ vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison
LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.94% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.19% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% |
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LFEQ vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and IQM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFEQ | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.19% | -44.91% | +9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.30% | -14.71% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.55% | -44.91% | +19.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.68% | -6.86% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -12.55% | +6.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 4.72% | -2.05% |
Volatility
LFEQ vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) is 5.32%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.71%. This indicates that LFEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LFEQ | IQM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 12.71% | -7.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.61% | 23.53% | -13.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.50% | 33.40% | -15.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.37% | 28.67% | -14.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.68% | 30.73% | -13.05% |