LFEQ vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
LFEQ and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LFEQ is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD. It was launched on Oct 4, 2017. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LFEQ or BDGS.
Correlation
The correlation between LFEQ and BDGS is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LFEQ vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
LFEQ:
1.80
BDGS:
4.00
LFEQ:
2.45
BDGS:
7.09
LFEQ:
1.33
BDGS:
2.25
LFEQ:
2.69
BDGS:
8.75
LFEQ:
11.16
BDGS:
38.34
LFEQ:
2.06%
BDGS:
0.55%
LFEQ:
12.70%
BDGS:
5.24%
LFEQ:
-35.19%
BDGS:
-5.38%
LFEQ:
0.00%
BDGS:
-0.02%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly higher than BDGS's 2.70% return.
LFEQ
4.19%
2.10%
10.53%
23.28%
11.77%
N/A
BDGS
2.70%
1.01%
9.74%
20.89%
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LFEQ vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LFEQ vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
LFEQ
BDGS
LFEQ vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LFEQ vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than BDGS's 1.76% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.71% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.20% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 1.76% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LFEQ vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -5.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and BDGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LFEQ vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) has a higher volatility of 3.17% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.25%. This indicates that LFEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.