LFEQ vs. PTLC
LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and PTLC (Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LFEQ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while PTLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LFEQ returned 8.90%/yr vs 9.71%/yr for PTLC. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTLC.
Performance
LFEQ vs. PTLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than PTLC's 4.79% return.
LFEQ
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 8.40%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 1Y
- 20.95%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.53%
PTLC
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- 6M
- 3.32%
- YTD
- 4.79%
- 1Y
- 15.35%
- 3Y*
- 12.14%
- 5Y*
- 9.71%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $53.35K | $94.32K | $91.22K | |
| $5.28M | $5.56M | $6.06M |
LFEQ vs. PTLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 9.84% | 10.49% | 24.30% | 19.66% | -22.05% | 27.97% | 17.56% | 24.07% | -5.55% | 5.48% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 4.79% | 5.10% | 24.31% | 16.78% | -8.62% | 27.90% | -1.15% | 17.58% | 1.49% | 5.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFEQ and PTLC is 0.99 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between LFEQ and PTLC shifts across timeframes, from 0.87 (all time) to 0.99 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFEQ vs. PTLC — Risk / Return Rank
LFEQ
PTLC
LFEQ vs. PTLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LFEQ | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.14 | 1.54 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.09 | 5.72 | +3.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LFEQ vs. PTLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, which is greater than PTLC's maximum drawdown of -26.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and PTLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFEQ | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.19% | -26.63% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -8.77% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -15.17% | -3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.55% | -15.17% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -1.44% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -5.59% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 2.36% | -0.25% |
Volatility
LFEQ vs. PTLC - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF (PTLC) have volatilities of 3.57% and 3.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFEQ | PTLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 3.44% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 9.34% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.85% | 12.27% | +0.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 11.88% | +2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 13.17% | +4.36% |
LFEQ vs. PTLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than PTLC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFEQ vs. PTLC - Dividend Comparison
LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than PTLC's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.19% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTLC Pacer Trendpilot US Large Cap ETF | 1.01% | 1.06% | 0.67% | 1.18% | 1.26% | 0.73% | 1.08% | 1.10% | 1.00% | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, LFEQ and PTLC move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LFEQ has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to PTLC (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs PTLC's -26.63%.
On 5-year performance, PTLC leads with 9.71% vs 8.90% for LFEQ. On fees, LFEQ is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PTLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PTLC has performed better with a 9.71% return vs 8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LFEQ is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTLC.
PTLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.82% for LFEQ.
LFEQ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PTLC is Large Cap Blend Equities. LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while PTLC tracks Pacer Trendpilot U.S. Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.60% for PTLC.
LFEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFEQ and PTLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer