LFEQ vs. HLAL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and HLAL (Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - LFEQ tracks the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD while HLAL tracks the FTSE Shariah USA Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LFEQ returned 9.91%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for HLAL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HLAL.

Performance

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LFEQ achieves a 10.63% return, which is significantly lower than HLAL's 18.72% return.

LFEQ

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 10.63%
• 6M: 10.69%
• 1Y: 27.35%
• 3Y*: 18.29%
• 5Y*: 9.91%
• 10Y*: —

HLAL

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: 9.45%
• YTD: 18.72%
• 6M: 17.75%
• 1Y: 43.63%
• 3Y*: 22.04%
• 5Y*: 15.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	10.63%	10.49%	24.30%	19.66%	-22.05%	27.97%	17.56%	8.16%
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	18.72%	18.30%	16.70%	30.13%	-17.56%	28.64%	24.65%	10.96%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEQ and HLAL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019	0.88

The correlation between LFEQ and HLAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LFEQ	HLAL
Technology	33.6%	50.4%
Financial Services	12.2%	0.0%
Communication Services	10.5%	16.7%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	5.6%
Healthcare	9.5%	10.5%
Industrials	8.5%	4.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.3%	2.9%
Energy	4.0%	4.5%
Utilities	2.6%	1.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	0.8%
Basic Materials	1.9%	2.5%

Return for Risk

LFEQ vs. HLAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFEQ

LFEQ Risk / Return Rank: 69
LFEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
LFEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
LFEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LFEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
LFEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 75

HLAL

HLAL Risk / Return Rank: 88
HLAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
HLAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
HLAL Omega Ratio Rank: 90
HLAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
HLAL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LFEQ	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	3.33	-1.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	4.62	-1.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.59	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	4.30	-1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.08	19.85	-5.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is lower than the HLAL Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFEQ and HLAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LFEQ	HLAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.30	3.33	-1.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	0.91	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.89	-0.22

Drawdowns

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, roughly equal to the maximum HLAL drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and HLAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LFEQ	HLAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.19%	-33.57%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.98%	-10.20%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.97%	-21.67%	+2.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.55%	-23.18%	-2.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-0.07%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-5.00%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	2.20%	-0.25%

Volatility

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) is 2.90%, while Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF (HLAL) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that LFEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LFEQ	HLAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.90%	3.70%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.09%	9.95%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.98%	13.17%	-1.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.36%	17.60%	-3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.58%	20.21%	-2.63%

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than HLAL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LFEQ vs. HLAL - Dividend Comparison

LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than HLAL's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HLAL Wahed FTSE USA Shariah ETF	0.44%	0.53%	0.58%	0.72%	1.15%	0.78%	0.97%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF	0.82%	0.90%	0.74%	1.56%	1.19%	0.37%	2.06%	1.45%	1.07%	0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LFEQ and HLAL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, LFEQ and HLAL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LFEQ or HLAL?

HLAL has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to LFEQ (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs HLAL's -33.57%.

Which ETF is better, LFEQ or HLAL?

On 5-year performance, HLAL leads with 15.86% vs 9.91% for LFEQ. On fees, HLAL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, LFEQ has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LFEQ or HLAL?

Over the 5-year period, HLAL has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LFEQ or HLAL?

HLAL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LFEQ or HLAL?

LFEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.82%, compared with 0.44% for HLAL.

What is the main difference between LFEQ and HLAL?

LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while HLAL tracks FTSE Shariah USA Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.50% for HLAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HLAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.