LFEQ vs. BBUS
LFEQ (VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - LFEQ tracks the Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LFEQ returned 9.91%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LFEQ charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
LFEQ vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LFEQ having a 10.63% return and BBUS slightly lower at 10.60%.
LFEQ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 10.63%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 27.35%
- 3Y*
- 18.29%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
LFEQ vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 10.63% | 10.49% | 24.30% | 19.66% | -22.05% | 27.97% | 17.56% | 16.35% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between LFEQ and BBUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between LFEQ and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
LFEQ vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LFEQ
BBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
LFEQ
BBUS
Financial Services
LFEQ
BBUS
Communication Services
LFEQ
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
LFEQ
BBUS
Healthcare
LFEQ
BBUS
Industrials
LFEQ
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
LFEQ
BBUS
Energy
LFEQ
BBUS
Utilities
LFEQ
BBUS
Real Estate
LFEQ
BBUS
Basic Materials
LFEQ
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LFEQ vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
LFEQ
BBUS
LFEQ vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LFEQ | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.06 | 3.00 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.08 | 13.76 | +0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LFEQ | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.30 | 2.33 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.79 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
LFEQ vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LFEQ | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.19% | -35.35% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -9.21% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.97% | -19.01% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.55% | -25.46% | -0.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.61% | -0.74% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.16% | -5.46% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 2.00% | -0.05% |
Volatility
LFEQ vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LFEQ | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.90% | 2.88% | +0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 8.96% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.98% | 11.87% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.36% | 17.03% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.58% | 19.59% | -2.01% |
LFEQ vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
LFEQ vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LFEQ VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF | 0.82% | 0.90% | 0.74% | 1.56% | 1.19% | 0.37% | 2.06% | 1.45% | 1.07% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, LFEQ and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LFEQ has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 9.91% for LFEQ. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.82% for LFEQ.
LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LFEQ and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer