PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LFEQ vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LFEQ having a 10.63% return and BBUS slightly lower at 10.60%.


LFEQ

1D
-0.61%
1M
5.08%
YTD
10.63%
6M
10.69%
1Y
27.35%
3Y*
18.29%
5Y*
9.91%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
10.63%10.49%24.30%19.66%-22.05%27.97%17.56%16.35%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between LFEQ and BBUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.93

The correlation between LFEQ and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LFEQ
BBUS

Technology

33.6%
37.1%

Financial Services

12.2%
10.8%

Communication Services

10.5%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
9.4%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.1%

Industrials

8.5%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
4.5%

Energy

4.0%
3.2%

Utilities

2.6%
2.6%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.9%
1.2%

Technology

LFEQ
33.6%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

LFEQ
12.2%
BBUS
10.8%

Communication Services

LFEQ
10.5%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

LFEQ
10.0%
BBUS
9.4%

Healthcare

LFEQ
9.5%
BBUS
8.1%

Industrials

LFEQ
8.5%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

LFEQ
5.3%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

LFEQ
4.0%
BBUS
3.2%

Utilities

LFEQ
2.6%
BBUS
2.6%

Real Estate

LFEQ
2.0%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

LFEQ
1.9%
BBUS
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LFEQ vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LFEQ
LFEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LFEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LFEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
LFEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
LFEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LFEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LFEQBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

3.00

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.08

13.76

+0.33

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LFEQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LFEQ and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LFEQBBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.33

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.79

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.84

-0.16

Drawdowns

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LFEQ drawdown since its inception was -35.19%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LFEQ and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LFEQBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.19%

-35.35%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-9.21%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.97%

-19.01%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.55%

-25.46%

-0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.74%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-5.46%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.00%

-0.05%

Volatility

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF (LFEQ) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 2.90% and 2.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LFEQBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.88%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.09%

8.96%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.98%

11.87%

+0.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

17.03%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.58%

19.59%

-2.01%

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LFEQ has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

LFEQ vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

LFEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%
LFEQ
VanEck Long/Flat Trend ETF
0.82%0.90%0.74%1.56%1.19%0.37%2.06%1.45%1.07%0.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, LFEQ and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LFEQ has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LFEQ dropped -35.19% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 9.91% for LFEQ. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for LFEQ.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.82% for LFEQ.

LFEQ tracks Ned Davis Research CMG US Large Cap Long/Flat Index - USD, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for LFEQ and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LFEQ and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer