PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENVA vs. OMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENVA vs. OMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENVA achieves a 34.22% return, which is significantly higher than OMF's -10.73% return. Over the past 10 years, ENVA has outperformed OMF with an annualized return of 40.24%, while OMF has yielded a comparatively lower 18.94% annualized return.


ENVA

1D
3.05%
1M
33.95%
YTD
34.22%
6M
29.33%
1Y
111.46%
3Y*
59.57%
5Y*
43.15%
10Y*
40.24%

OMF

1D
-0.26%
1M
8.60%
YTD
-10.73%
6M
-12.21%
1Y
15.72%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
8.92%
10Y*
18.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENVA vs. OMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENVA
Enova International, Inc.
34.22%63.95%73.19%44.28%-6.32%65.36%2.95%23.64%28.03%21.12%
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
-10.73%39.77%15.14%63.03%-27.20%23.56%34.53%88.37%-6.54%17.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ENVA and OMF is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2015

0.62

The correlation between ENVA and OMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ENVA:

$5.56B

OMF:

$6.81B

EPS

ENVA:

$12.29

OMF:

$6.71

PE Ratio

ENVA:

17.16

OMF:

8.65

PS Ratio

ENVA:

1.71

OMF:

1.39

PB Ratio

ENVA:

3.97

OMF:

2.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

ENVA:

$3.28B

OMF:

$4.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ENVA:

$1.23B

OMF:

$2.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

ENVA:

$456.13M

OMF:

$943.00M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENVA vs. OMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENVA
ENVA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ENVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENVA Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ENVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENVA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

OMF
OMF Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
OMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMF Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
OMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENVA vs. OMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENVAOMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.11

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

0.53

+4.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.69

1.17

+10.52

ENVA vs. OMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the OMF Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENVA and OMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENVA vs. OMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENVA drawdown since its inception was -84.26%, which is greater than OMF's maximum drawdown of -68.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVA and OMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENVAOMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.26%

-68.66%

-15.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.75%

-29.68%

+4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.01%

-29.94%

-7.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.84%

-47.93%

+5.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.57%

-68.66%

-8.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-15.51%

+15.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.75%

-24.27%

-7.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.57%

13.47%

-3.90%

Volatility

ENVA vs. OMF - Volatility Comparison

Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) has a higher volatility of 10.02% compared to OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) at 8.06%. This indicates that ENVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENVAOMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.02%

8.06%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.62%

21.24%

+5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.58%

28.86%

+9.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.27%

35.58%

+4.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.23%

45.92%

+3.31%

Dividends

ENVA vs. OMF - Dividend Comparison

ENVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.21%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ENVA
Enova International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OMF
OneMain Holdings, Inc.
7.21%6.17%7.90%8.13%11.41%19.08%12.33%7.12%

Financials

ENVA vs. OMF - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enova International, Inc. and OneMain Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
875.14M
197.00M
(ENVA) Total Revenue
(OMF) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ENVA and OMF have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENVA has higher volatility (10.02%) compared to OMF (8.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENVA dropped -84.26% vs OMF's -68.66%.

ENVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENVA and OMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer