ENVA vs. WM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM).

Performance

ENVA vs. WM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ENVA vs. WM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENVA Enova International, Inc.	-13.59%	63.95%	73.19%	44.28%	-6.32%	65.36%	2.95%	23.64%	28.03%	21.12%
WM Waste Management, Inc.	5.00%	10.50%	14.28%	16.20%	-4.49%	43.82%	5.46%	30.45%	5.32%	24.46%

Fundamentals

Market Cap ENVA : $3.58B WM : $92.95B
EPS ENVA : $11.58 WM : $6.70
PE Ratio ENVA : 11.73 WM : 34.31
PEG Ratio ENVA : 0.64 WM : 2.81
PS Ratio ENVA : 1.15 WM : 3.69
PB Ratio ENVA : 2.68 WM : 9.30
Total Revenue (TTM) ENVA : $3.15B WM : $25.20B
Gross Profit (TTM) ENVA : $1.58B WM : $7.33B
EBITDA (TTM) ENVA : $529.82M WM : $7.27B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENVA achieves a -13.59% return, which is significantly lower than WM's 5.00% return. Over the past 10 years, ENVA has outperformed WM with an annualized return of 36.52%, while WM has yielded a comparatively lower 16.64% annualized return.

ENVA

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -2.32%
• YTD: -13.59%
• 6M: 18.02%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 45.14%
• 5Y*: 30.35%
• 10Y*: 36.52%

WM

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: 5.00%
• 6M: 4.88%
• 1Y: 0.76%
• 3Y*: 13.82%
• 5Y*: 13.95%
• 10Y*: 16.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

ENVA vs. WM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENVA

ENVA Risk / Return Rank: 72
ENVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
ENVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
ENVA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
ENVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
ENVA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

WM

WM Risk / Return Rank: 41
WM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
WM Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
WM Omega Ratio Rank: 35
WM Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
WM Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENVA vs. WM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and Waste Management, Inc. (WM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENVA	WM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	0.04	+0.93
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	0.18	+1.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.02	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	0.13	+1.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.19	0.31	+3.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENVA vs. WM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENVA Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the WM Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENVA and WM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENVA	WM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	0.04	+0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.77	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.86	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.37	-0.07

Correlation

The correlation between ENVA and WM is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

ENVA vs. WM - Dividend Comparison

ENVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENVA Enova International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WM Waste Management, Inc.	1.49%	1.50%	1.49%	1.56%	1.66%	1.38%	1.85%	1.80%	2.09%	1.97%	2.31%	2.89%

Drawdowns

ENVA vs. WM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENVA drawdown since its inception was -81.56%, roughly equal to the maximum WM drawdown of -77.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVA and WM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENVA	WM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.56%	-77.85%	-3.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.75%	-18.14%	-6.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.84%	-18.14%	-24.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-77.57%	-30.07%	-47.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.20%	-6.41%	-14.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.97%	-17.74%	-12.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.85%	7.53%	+2.32%

Volatility

ENVA vs. WM - Volatility Comparison

Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to Waste Management, Inc. (WM) at 5.94%. This indicates that ENVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENVA	WM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.48%	5.94%	+2.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.61%	13.99%	+15.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.20%	19.06%	+23.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.29%	18.30%	+21.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.09%	19.38%	+30.71%

Financials

ENVA vs. WM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Enova International, Inc. and Waste Management, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ENVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 501.89M and revenue of 839.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.8%.

WM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.85B and revenue of 6.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.3%.

ENVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported an operating income of 186.65M and revenue of 839.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.2%.

WM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.18B and revenue of 6.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.

ENVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Enova International, Inc. reported a net income of 78.98M and revenue of 839.39M, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.

WM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Waste Management, Inc. reported a net income of 742.00M and revenue of 6.31B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.