LEGR vs. QSOL
LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) and QSOL (Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while QSOL is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QSOL.
Performance
LEGR vs. QSOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 9.24% return, which is significantly higher than QSOL's -43.81% return.
LEGR
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -0.51%
- YTD
- 9.24%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 25.32%
- 3Y*
- 22.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- —
QSOL
- 1D
- -5.21%
- 1M
- -18.27%
- YTD
- -43.81%
- 6M
- -44.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LEGR vs. QSOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 9.24% | 1.90% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | -43.81% | -4.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR and QSOL is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR vs. QSOL — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR
QSOL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LEGR vs. QSOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF (QSOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEGR | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEGR vs. QSOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum QSOL drawdown of -56.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and QSOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -56.55% | +20.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.26% | -52.76% | +48.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -33.92% | +27.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | — | — |
Volatility
LEGR vs. QSOL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR | QSOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.30% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.54% | 72.31% | -57.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 72.31% | -55.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 72.31% | -51.98% |
LEGR vs. QSOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QSOL's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR vs. QSOL - Dividend Comparison
LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, more than QSOL's 0.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.71% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% |
QSOL Invesco Galaxy Solana ETF | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR and QSOL have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QSOL is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QSOL is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.
LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 0.99% for QSOL.
LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while QSOL is Cryptocurrency. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while QSOL tracks Lukka Prime Solana Reference Rate - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.25% for QSOL.
Find the right allocation for LEGR and QSOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer