LEGR vs. QQQ
LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR returned 11.61%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for QQQ. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
LEGR vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 11.18% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 17.57% return.
LEGR
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 28.16%
- 3Y*
- 22.32%
- 5Y*
- 11.61%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 37.55%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
LEGR vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 11.18% | 30.83% | 16.25% | 22.79% | -19.01% | 17.91% | 18.73% | 27.99% | -14.65% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -7.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR and QQQ is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.77 |
The correlation between LEGR and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
LEGR vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEGR
QQQ
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LEGR
QQQ
Technology
LEGR
QQQ
Consumer Cyclical
LEGR
QQQ
Communication Services
LEGR
QQQ
Industrials
LEGR
QQQ
Utilities
LEGR
QQQ
Basic Materials
LEGR
QQQ
Consumer Defensive
LEGR
QQQ
Healthcare
LEGR
QQQ
Energy
LEGR
QQQ
Real Estate
LEGR
-
QQQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR
QQQ
LEGR vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEGR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 3.01 | -0.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 11.22 | -1.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEGR vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -82.97% | +46.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -11.96% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | -22.77% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -35.12% | +3.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.56% | -3.33% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.60% | -32.75% | +26.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 3.20% | -0.38% |
Volatility
LEGR vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) is 5.87%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that LEGR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 7.56% | -1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 13.81% | -1.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.34% | 17.19% | -2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 22.55% | -5.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 22.38% | -2.05% |
LEGR vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than QQQ's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.68% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR and QQQ have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to LEGR (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 16.85% vs 11.61% for LEGR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, LEGR has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 16.85% return vs 11.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LEGR.
LEGR has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.18% for QQQ.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEGR and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer