LEGR vs. KNG
LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) and KNG (FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LEGR is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LEGR returned 11.82%/yr vs 4.31%/yr for KNG. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LEGR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.
Performance
LEGR vs. KNG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEGR achieves a 12.39% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.
LEGR
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- 7.23%
- YTD
- 12.39%
- 6M
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 30.64%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 11.82%
- 10Y*
- —
KNG
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 7.44%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- —
LEGR vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 12.39% | 30.83% | 16.25% | 22.79% | -19.01% | 17.91% | 18.73% | 27.99% | -10.08% |
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 2.20% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -7.03% | 24.78% | 7.21% | 26.64% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEGR and KNG is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LEGR and KNG has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
LEGR vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LEGR
KNG
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
LEGR
KNG
Technology
LEGR
KNG
Communication Services
LEGR
KNG
-
Consumer Cyclical
LEGR
KNG
Industrials
LEGR
KNG
Utilities
LEGR
KNG
Basic Materials
LEGR
KNG
Consumer Defensive
LEGR
KNG
Healthcare
LEGR
KNG
Energy
LEGR
KNG
Real Estate
LEGR
-
KNG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEGR vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank
LEGR
KNG
LEGR vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEGR | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.13 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.96 | 0.87 | +2.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 2.25 | +8.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEGR | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.26 | 0.73 | +1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.32 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.49 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
LEGR vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEGR drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, roughly equal to the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEGR and KNG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEGR | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.12% | -35.12% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -8.61% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.25% | -14.24% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.45% | -18.20% | -13.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -5.89% | +4.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.61% | -4.13% | -2.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 3.32% | -0.58% |
Volatility
LEGR vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) has a higher volatility of 4.93% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that LEGR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEGR | KNG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.93% | 2.29% | +2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 7.39% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 10.19% | +3.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 13.59% | +3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.31% | 17.18% | +3.13% |
LEGR vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LEGR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LEGR vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison
LEGR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.67% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LEGR and KNG have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEGR has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEGR dropped -36.12% vs KNG's -35.12%.
On 5-year performance, LEGR leads with 11.82% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, LEGR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LEGR has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LEGR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.
KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 1.67% for LEGR.
LEGR is categorized as Blockchain, while KNG is Dividend. LEGR tracks Indxx Blockchain Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LEGR and 0.75% for KNG.
LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEGR and KNG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer