LEG vs. KMB
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -11.06%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEG vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -3.16% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -11.06%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 0.95% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 15.59%
- YTD
- -3.16%
- 6M
- -7.69%
- 1Y
- 16.39%
- 3Y*
- -27.77%
- 5Y*
- -24.81%
- 10Y*
- -11.06%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
LEG vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -3.16% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and KMB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.49B
KMB:
$34.08B
LEG:
$1.60
KMB:
$5.93
LEG:
6.62
KMB:
17.26
LEG:
0.49
KMB:
2.06
LEG:
1.44
KMB:
18.98
LEG:
$3.03B
KMB:
$16.54B
LEG:
$717.40M
KMB:
$5.93B
LEG:
$433.10M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
KMB
LEG vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 0.87 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | -0.67 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | -1.03 | +1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEG vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -36.97% | -49.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -29.60% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.26% | -34.06% | -43.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.96% | -34.06% | -50.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -34.06% | -52.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.60% | -26.52% | -51.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.65% | -8.85% | -10.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.77% | 19.43% | -5.66% |
Volatility
LEG vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 11.98% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.98% | 8.42% | +3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.40% | 16.67% | +14.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.76% | 25.77% | +23.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.50% | 20.19% | +22.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.81% | 21.07% | +18.74% |
Dividends
LEG vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than KMB's 4.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.42% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
LEG vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and KMB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs KMB's -36.97%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.25 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer