LEG vs. KMB
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -12.01%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for KMB. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LEG vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a -10.05% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 11.19% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -12.01%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.74% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -16.02%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- -29.16%
- 5Y*
- -24.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
KMB
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- -7.99%
- 3Y*
- -1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.90%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.44M | $393.74M | $451.43M | |
| $18.50M | $23.27M | $28.03M |
LEG vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -10.05% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 11.19% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and KMB is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.34B
KMB:
$36.28B
LEG:
$1.60
KMB:
$5.93
LEG:
6.13
KMB:
18.44
LEG:
0.45
KMB:
2.20
LEG:
1.33
KMB:
20.28
LEG:
$3.03B
KMB:
$16.54B
LEG:
$717.40M
KMB:
$5.93B
LEG:
$433.10M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
KMB
LEG vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.97 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.27 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | -0.39 | +0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEG vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -36.97% | -49.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -29.60% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.68% | -34.06% | -42.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.29% | -34.06% | -50.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -34.06% | -52.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.20% | -21.48% | -57.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.84% | -8.89% | -10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.72% | 20.31% | -6.59% |
Volatility
LEG vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.53%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.32% | 8.53% | +2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.38% | 18.63% | +13.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.36% | 27.16% | +22.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.74% | 20.63% | +22.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.96% | 21.25% | +18.71% |
Dividends
LEG vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than KMB's 4.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.65% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 2.04% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
LEG vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and KMB have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to KMB (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs KMB's -36.97%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer