LEG vs. KMB
LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, LEG returned -11.28%/yr vs 1.72%/yr for KMB. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEG vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEG achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, LEG has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -11.28%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.72% annualized return.
LEG
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- -10.27%
- YTD
- 0.42%
- 1Y
- 10.09%
- 3Y*
- -26.27%
- 5Y*
- -23.47%
- 10Y*
- -11.28%
KMB
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 17.81%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- -8.86%
- 3Y*
- -2.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
LEG vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 0.42% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 14.34% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEG and KMB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
LEG:
$1.49B
KMB:
$37.31B
LEG:
$1.60
KMB:
$5.93
LEG:
6.85
KMB:
18.96
LEG:
0.51
KMB:
2.26
LEG:
1.48
KMB:
20.85
LEG:
$3.03B
KMB:
$16.54B
LEG:
$717.40M
KMB:
$5.93B
LEG:
$433.10M
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEG vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
LEG
KMB
LEG vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.95 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | -0.36 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.57 | -0.53 | +1.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEG vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEG drawdown since its inception was -86.41%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEG and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.41% | -36.97% | -49.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.51% | -29.60% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.78% | -34.06% | -42.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.29% | -34.06% | -50.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.41% | -34.06% | -52.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.78% | -19.25% | -57.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.76% | -8.87% | -10.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.12% | 19.94% | -5.82% |
Volatility
LEG vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.21%. This indicates that LEG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEG | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.79% | 8.21% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.85% | 18.09% | +13.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.11% | 26.74% | +22.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.59% | 20.49% | +22.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.87% | 21.18% | +18.69% |
Dividends
LEG vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
LEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than KMB's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.52% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 1.83% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
LEG vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leggett & Platt, Incorporated and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LEG and KMB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to KMB (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEG dropped -86.41% vs KMB's -36.97%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.16 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEG and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer