LEAD vs. SCHB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB).

LEAD and SCHB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LEAD is a passively managed fund by SRN Advisors that tracks the performance of the Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend Index. It was launched on Jan 6, 2016. SCHB is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Nov 3, 2009. Both LEAD and SCHB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LEAD vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LEAD vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF	1.87%	15.52%	10.32%	26.25%	-18.16%	29.69%	23.41%	33.75%	-6.63%	24.89%
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF	-3.28%	16.94%	23.93%	26.16%	-19.46%	25.84%	20.76%	30.79%	-5.43%	21.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEAD achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's -3.28% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LEAD having a 13.26% annualized return and SCHB not far ahead at 13.66%.

LEAD

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: -4.51%
• YTD: 1.87%
• 6M: 1.47%
• 1Y: 20.28%
• 3Y*: 14.52%
• 5Y*: 10.31%
• 10Y*: 13.26%

SCHB

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -4.34%
• YTD: -3.28%
• 6M: -1.36%
• 1Y: 18.46%
• 3Y*: 18.16%
• 5Y*: 10.69%
• 10Y*: 13.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEAD vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LEAD has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.

LEAD

Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF

SCHB

Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF

Return for Risk

LEAD vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEAD

LEAD Risk / Return Rank: 63
LEAD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
LEAD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
LEAD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
LEAD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
LEAD Martin Ratio Rank: 73

SCHB

SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 60
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEAD vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LEAD	SCHB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.01	+0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.64	1.53	+0.11
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.23	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	1.55	+0.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.36	7.26	+1.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LEAD vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEAD Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is comparable to the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEAD and SCHB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LEAD	SCHB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.10	1.01	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.62	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	0.75	-0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.78	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between LEAD and SCHB is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LEAD vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

LEAD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than SCHB's 1.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LEAD Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF	0.66%	0.70%	0.93%	1.13%	1.27%	1.79%	0.81%	1.32%	1.38%	0.97%	1.38%	0.00%
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF	1.17%	1.11%	1.24%	1.40%	1.61%	1.21%	1.63%	1.80%	2.00%	1.65%	1.86%	2.00%

Drawdowns

LEAD vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEAD drawdown since its inception was -32.19%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEAD and SCHB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEAD	SCHB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.19%	-35.27%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	-12.22%	+1.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.93%	-25.41%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.19%	-35.27%	+3.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.94%	-5.51%	+0.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-4.15%	-0.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.45%	2.60%	-0.15%

Volatility

LEAD vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

Siren DIVCON Leaders Dividend ETF (LEAD) has a higher volatility of 5.85% compared to Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) at 5.51%. This indicates that LEAD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEAD	SCHB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.85%	5.51%	+0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.60%	9.78%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.55%	18.34%	+0.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.27%	17.25%	+0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.60%	18.30%	+0.30%