LEA vs. VFC
LEA (Lear Corporation) and VFC (V.F. Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — LEA in Auto Parts, VFC in Apparel Manufacturing. Over the past 10 years, LEA returned 4.24%/yr vs -9.34%/yr for VFC. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LEA vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEA achieves a 27.89% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, LEA has outperformed VFC with an annualized return of 4.24%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively lower -9.34% annualized return.
LEA
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 12.18%
- YTD
- 27.89%
- 6M
- 35.08%
- 1Y
- 67.80%
- 3Y*
- 6.38%
- 5Y*
- -4.07%
- 10Y*
- 4.24%
VFC
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- -10.77%
- YTD
- -8.76%
- 6M
- -11.20%
- 1Y
- 34.56%
- 3Y*
- -0.45%
- 5Y*
- -24.49%
- 10Y*
- -9.34%
LEA vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEA Lear Corporation | 27.89% | 24.86% | -31.17% | 16.40% | -30.70% | 16.20% | 16.90% | 14.38% | -29.29% | 35.23% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | -8.76% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEA and VFC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2009 | 0.48 |
The correlation between LEA and VFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
LEA:
$9.98
VFC:
$0.57
LEA:
14.52
VFC:
28.92
LEA:
1.18
VFC:
0.54
LEA:
0.33
VFC:
0.67
LEA:
$23.52B
VFC:
$9.58B
LEA:
$1.26B
VFC:
$5.16B
LEA:
$1.20B
VFC:
$961.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEA vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank
LEA
VFC
LEA vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lear Corporation (LEA) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LEA | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.07 | 0.71 | +1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.97 | 1.28 | +1.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.16 | +0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 1.36 | +2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.68 | 3.22 | +5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LEA | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 0.71 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.12 | -0.46 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | -0.21 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 0.23 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
LEA vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEA drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, smaller than the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEA and VFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEA | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.51% | -88.41% | +23.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.98% | -25.57% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.42% | -63.66% | +14.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.29% | -86.78% | +27.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.51% | -88.41% | +23.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.46% | -80.01% | +60.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.83% | -21.63% | +1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 10.76% | -2.92% |
Volatility
LEA vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lear Corporation (LEA) is 10.80%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 13.15%. This indicates that LEA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEA | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.80% | 13.15% | -2.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.52% | 31.34% | -6.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.96% | 48.79% | -15.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.09% | 53.49% | -19.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.45% | 44.89% | -9.44% |
Dividends
LEA vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
LEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, more than VFC's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEA Lear Corporation | 2.66% | 2.69% | 3.25% | 2.18% | 2.48% | 0.97% | 0.64% | 2.19% | 2.28% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 0.81% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.19% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
LEA vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lear Corporation and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LEA vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison
LEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lear Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.
LEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lear Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 5.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 289.05M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
LEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lear Corporation reported a net income of 172.30M and revenue of 5.82B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of 300.85M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEA and VFC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFC has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to LEA (10.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEA dropped -64.51% vs VFC's -88.41%.
LEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEA and VFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer