LEA vs. CI
LEA (Lear Corporation) and CI (The Cigna Group) are both stocks. LEA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while CI operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LEA returned 3.77%/yr vs 9.54%/yr for CI. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LEA vs. CI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LEA achieves a 15.32% return, which is significantly higher than CI's 2.54% return. Over the past 10 years, LEA has underperformed CI with an annualized return of 3.77%, while CI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.54% annualized return.
LEA
- 1D
- -10.72%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- YTD
- 15.32%
- 1Y
- 44.05%
- 3Y*
- -2.88%
- 5Y*
- -3.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.98%
CI
- 1D
- -2.99%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- 6M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 2.54%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.02%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $460.57M | $474.33M | $477.27M | |
| $107.51M | $84.47M | $90.13M |
LEA vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEA Lear Corporation | 15.32% | 24.86% | -31.17% | 16.40% | -30.70% | 16.20% | 16.90% | 14.38% | -29.29% | 35.23% |
CI The Cigna Group | 2.54% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 7.70% | -6.46% | 52.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between LEA and CI is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2009 | 0.32 |
The correlation between LEA and CI shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LEA:
$6.54B
CI:
$73.82B
LEA:
$10.65
CI:
$24.16
LEA:
12.27
CI:
11.55
LEA:
1.00
CI:
0.67
LEA:
0.29
CI:
0.26
LEA:
0.75
CI:
1.73
LEA:
$23.70B
CI:
$282.38B
LEA:
$789.80M
CI:
$17.96B
LEA:
$1.18B
CI:
$9.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LEA vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank
LEA
CI
LEA vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lear Corporation (LEA) and The Cigna Group (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LEA | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 0.31 | +1.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 0.74 | +4.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LEA vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LEA drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, smaller than the maximum CI drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEA and CI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LEA | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.51% | -84.34% | +19.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.98% | -21.41% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.42% | -32.10% | -17.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.83% | -32.10% | -25.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.51% | -42.47% | -22.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.38% | -21.16% | -6.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -18.82% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.64% | 9.02% | -1.38% |
Volatility
LEA vs. CI - Volatility Comparison
Lear Corporation (LEA) has a higher volatility of 13.77% compared to The Cigna Group (CI) at 10.65%. This indicates that LEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LEA | CI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.77% | 10.65% | +3.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.11% | 20.43% | +6.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.24% | 33.83% | -0.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.34% | 28.73% | +5.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.39% | 30.70% | +4.69% |
Dividends
LEA vs. CI - Dividend Comparison
LEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than CI's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI The Cigna Group | 2.20% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
LEA Lear Corporation | 2.36% | 2.69% | 3.25% | 2.18% | 2.48% | 0.97% | 0.64% | 2.19% | 2.28% | 1.13% | 0.91% | 0.81% |
Financials
LEA vs. CI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lear Corporation and The Cigna Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LEA vs. CI - Profitability Comparison
LEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lear Corporation reported a gross profit of -442.10M and revenue of 6.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -7.1%.
CI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 71.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lear Corporation reported an operating income of -259.80M and revenue of 6.21B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.2%.
CI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported an operating income of 2.68B and revenue of 71.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.
LEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lear Corporation reported a net income of 192.80M and revenue of 6.21B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
CI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Cigna Group reported a net income of 1.66B and revenue of 71.67B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LEA and CI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEA has higher volatility (13.77%) compared to CI (10.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEA dropped -64.51% vs CI's -84.34%.
LEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LEA and CI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer