LEA vs. CI

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LEA (Lear Corporation) and CI (Cigna Corporation) are both stocks. LEA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while CI operates in Healthcare Plans (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, LEA returned 4.66%/yr vs 9.39%/yr for CI. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LEA vs. CI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lear Corporation (LEA) and Cigna Corporation (CI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEA achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than CI's 4.02% return. Over the past 10 years, LEA has underperformed CI with an annualized return of 4.66%, while CI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.39% annualized return.

LEA

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: -1.72%
• YTD: 20.65%
• 6M: 18.11%
• 1Y: 54.07%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: -2.87%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

CI

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 4.02%
• 6M: 4.58%
• 1Y: -8.71%
• 3Y*: 2.93%
• 5Y*: 5.74%
• 10Y*: 9.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEA vs. CI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LEA Lear Corporation	20.65%	24.86%	-31.17%	16.40%	-30.70%	16.20%	16.90%	14.38%	-29.29%	35.23%
CI Cigna Corporation	4.02%	1.72%	-6.27%	-7.97%	46.68%	12.29%	1.83%	7.70%	-6.46%	52.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LEA and CI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2009	0.33

The correlation between LEA and CI shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.33 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LEA : $7.05B CI : $74.74B
EPS LEA : $9.98 CI : $23.59
PE Ratio LEA : 13.69 CI : 12.00
PEG Ratio LEA : 1.11 CI : 0.69
PS Ratio LEA : 0.31 CI : 0.27
PB Ratio LEA : 2.18 CI : 1.77
Total Revenue (TTM) LEA : $23.52B CI : $277.94B
Gross Profit (TTM) LEA : $1.26B CI : $19.38B
EBITDA (TTM) LEA : $1.20B CI : $10.03B

Return for Risk

LEA vs. CI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEA

LEA Risk / Return Rank: 83
LEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
LEA Omega Ratio Rank: 80
LEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
LEA Martin Ratio Rank: 82

CI

CI Risk / Return Rank: 30
CI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
CI Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
CI Omega Ratio Rank: 28
CI Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
CI Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEA vs. CI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lear Corporation (LEA) and Cigna Corporation (CI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LEA	CI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	-0.26	+1.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	-0.13	+2.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.98	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.86	-0.33	+3.19
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.91	-0.59	+7.50

LEA vs. CI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the CI Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEA and CI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LEA vs. CI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEA drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, smaller than the maximum CI drawdown of -84.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEA and CI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LEA	CI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.51%	-84.34%	+19.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.98%	-26.54%	+7.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.42%	-32.10%	-17.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.83%	-32.10%	-25.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.51%	-42.47%	-22.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.02%	-20.02%	-4.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.83%	-18.82%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.85%	14.71%	-6.86%

Volatility

LEA vs. CI - Volatility Comparison

Lear Corporation (LEA) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to Cigna Corporation (CI) at 8.10%. This indicates that LEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LEA	CI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.63%	8.10%	+0.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.64%	18.89%	+5.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.76%	33.34%	-0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.05%	28.44%	+5.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	35.35%	30.77%	+4.58%

Dividends

LEA vs. CI - Dividend Comparison

LEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than CI's 2.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CI Cigna Corporation	2.17%	2.19%	2.03%	1.64%	1.35%	1.74%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%
LEA Lear Corporation	2.25%	2.69%	3.25%	2.18%	2.48%	0.97%	0.64%	2.19%	2.28%	1.13%	0.91%	0.81%

Financials

LEA vs. CI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lear Corporation and Cigna Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lear Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

CI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 68.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lear Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 5.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 2.36B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.4%.

LEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lear Corporation reported a net income of 172.30M and revenue of 5.82B, resulting in a net margin of 3.0%.

CI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.65B and revenue of 68.49B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LEA and CI in my portfolio?

LEA and CI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LEA or CI?

LEA has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to CI (8.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEA dropped -64.51% vs CI's -84.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.