PortfoliosLab logo
LEA vs. ALV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LEA and ALV is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LEA vs. ALV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lear Corporation (LEA) and Autoliv, Inc. (ALV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

250.00%300.00%350.00%400.00%450.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
291.56%
414.25%
LEA
ALV

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LEA:

-0.89

ALV:

-0.65

Sortino Ratio

LEA:

-1.12

ALV:

-0.75

Omega Ratio

LEA:

0.86

ALV:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

LEA:

-0.48

ALV:

-0.54

Martin Ratio

LEA:

-1.26

ALV:

-0.89

Ulcer Index

LEA:

22.45%

ALV:

23.65%

Daily Std Dev

LEA:

32.84%

ALV:

32.88%

Max Drawdown

LEA:

-64.51%

ALV:

-79.72%

Current Drawdown

LEA:

-52.24%

ALV:

-24.67%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LEA:

$4.65B

ALV:

$7.31B

EPS

LEA:

$8.97

ALV:

$8.66

PE Ratio

LEA:

9.68

ALV:

10.92

PEG Ratio

LEA:

0.36

ALV:

0.85

PS Ratio

LEA:

0.20

ALV:

0.70

PB Ratio

LEA:

1.04

ALV:

3.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

LEA:

$17.31B

ALV:

$10.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LEA:

$1.21B

ALV:

$1.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

LEA:

$1.13B

ALV:

$1.43B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEA achieves a -5.32% return, which is significantly lower than ALV's 2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, LEA has underperformed ALV with an annualized return of -0.73%, while ALV has yielded a comparatively higher 3.45% annualized return.


LEA

YTD

-5.32%

1M

18.29%

6M

-6.85%

1Y

-29.15%

5Y*

-0.82%

10Y*

-0.73%

ALV

YTD

2.27%

1M

24.05%

6M

-3.01%

1Y

-21.42%

5Y*

12.05%

10Y*

3.45%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LEA vs. ALV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LEA is 1414
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LEA is 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LEA is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LEA is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LEA is 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LEA is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ALV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ALV is 2121
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ALV is 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ALV is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ALV is 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ALV is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ALV is 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LEA vs. ALV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lear Corporation (LEA) and Autoliv, Inc. (ALV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LEA Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the ALV Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEA and ALV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.50-1.00-0.500.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.89
-0.65
LEA
ALV

Dividends

LEA vs. ALV - Dividend Comparison

LEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.46%, more than ALV's 2.90% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LEA
Lear Corporation
3.46%3.25%2.18%2.48%0.97%0.64%2.19%2.28%1.13%0.91%0.81%0.82%
ALV
Autoliv, Inc.
2.90%2.92%2.41%3.37%1.82%1.35%2.94%3.02%1.87%2.03%1.78%2.00%

Drawdowns

LEA vs. ALV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEA drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, smaller than the maximum ALV drawdown of -79.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEA and ALV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-52.24%
-24.67%
LEA
ALV

Volatility

LEA vs. ALV - Volatility Comparison

Lear Corporation (LEA) has a higher volatility of 15.27% compared to Autoliv, Inc. (ALV) at 12.07%. This indicates that LEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
15.27%
12.07%
LEA
ALV

Financials

LEA vs. ALV - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lear Corporation and Autoliv, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
5.71B
2.58B
(LEA) Total Revenue
(ALV) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LEA vs. ALV - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lear Corporation and Autoliv, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%20212022202320242025
6.8%
18.5%
(LEA) Gross Margin
(ALV) Gross Margin
LEA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lear Corporation reported a gross profit of 387.10M and revenue of 5.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 6.8%.

ALV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoliv, Inc. reported a gross profit of 478.00M and revenue of 2.58B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.

LEA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lear Corporation reported an operating income of 209.90M and revenue of 5.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.7%.

ALV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoliv, Inc. reported an operating income of 254.00M and revenue of 2.58B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

LEA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lear Corporation reported a net income of 88.10M and revenue of 5.71B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.

ALV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Autoliv, Inc. reported a net income of 167.00M and revenue of 2.58B, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.