VFC vs. UAA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Under Armour, Inc. (UAA).

Performance

VFC vs. UAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VFC vs. UAA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VFC V.F. Corporation	-5.93%	-13.83%	16.64%	-28.51%	-60.38%	-12.05%	-12.00%	51.70%	-1.33%	42.78%
UAA Under Armour, Inc.	15.69%	-39.98%	-5.80%	-13.48%	-52.05%	23.41%	-20.51%	22.24%	22.45%	-50.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VFC : $6.72B UAA : $2.44B
EPS VFC : $0.57 UAA : -$1.22
PS Ratio VFC : 0.70 UAA : 0.49
PB Ratio VFC : 3.77 UAA : 1.70
Total Revenue (TTM) VFC : $9.58B UAA : $4.98B
Gross Profit (TTM) VFC : $5.16B UAA : $2.32B
EBITDA (TTM) VFC : $753.14M UAA : -$45.77M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VFC achieves a -5.93% return, which is significantly lower than UAA's 15.69% return. Over the past 10 years, VFC has outperformed UAA with an annualized return of -9.48%, while UAA has yielded a comparatively lower -18.10% annualized return.

VFC

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -10.15%
• YTD: -5.93%
• 6M: 11.43%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: -7.00%
• 5Y*: -24.12%
• 10Y*: -9.48%

UAA

• 1D: -2.71%
• 1M: -20.47%
• YTD: 15.69%
• 6M: 14.31%
• 1Y: -9.45%
• 3Y*: -15.38%
• 5Y*: -23.52%
• 10Y*: -18.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VFC vs. UAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VFC

VFC Risk / Return Rank: 46
VFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
VFC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
VFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
VFC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

UAA

UAA Risk / Return Rank: 34
UAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
UAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
UAA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
UAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
UAA Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VFC vs. UAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Under Armour, Inc. (UAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VFC	UAA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.11	-0.17	+0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	0.17	+0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.02	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.29	-0.18	+0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.65	-0.32	+0.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VFC vs. UAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.11, which is higher than the UAA Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VFC and UAA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VFC	UAA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.11	-0.17	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	-0.45	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.21	-0.35	+0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.06	+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between VFC and UAA is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VFC vs. UAA - Dividend Comparison

VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while UAA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VFC V.F. Corporation	2.13%	1.99%	1.68%	5.27%	7.28%	2.69%	2.26%	1.91%	2.65%	2.32%	2.87%	2.14%
UAA Under Armour, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

VFC vs. UAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VFC drawdown since its inception was -88.41%, roughly equal to the maximum UAA drawdown of -91.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFC and UAA.

Drawdown Indicators

	VFC	UAA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.41%	-91.99%	+3.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.57%	-43.42%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.51%	-84.53%	-2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.41%	-91.13%	+2.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.39%	-88.95%	+9.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.39%	-45.35%	+23.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.70%	24.95%	-7.25%

Volatility

VFC vs. UAA - Volatility Comparison

V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) at 11.15%. This indicates that VFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VFC	UAA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	11.15%	+1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.73%	37.36%	-1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.94%	57.41%	+10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.13%	52.06%	+1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.57%	51.75%	-7.18%

Financials

VFC vs. UAA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

UAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 589.74M and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.4%.

VFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 289.05M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

UAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -149.78M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of -11.3%.

VFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of 300.85M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.

UAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -430.83M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of -32.5%.