VFC vs. SWK
VFC (V.F. Corporation) and SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) are both stocks. VFC operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while SWK operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, VFC returned -8.86%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for SWK. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VFC vs. SWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VFC achieves a -4.81% return, which is significantly lower than SWK's 18.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VFC has underperformed SWK with an annualized return of -8.86%, while SWK has yielded a comparatively higher 0.53% annualized return.
VFC
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- YTD
- -4.81%
- 6M
- -7.72%
- 1Y
- 48.58%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- -24.48%
- 10Y*
- -8.86%
SWK
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 14.09%
- YTD
- 18.74%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 39.81%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- -12.25%
- 10Y*
- 0.53%
VFC vs. SWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VFC V.F. Corporation | -4.81% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 18.74% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between VFC and SWK is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.40 |
The correlation between VFC and SWK shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VFC:
$0.57
SWK:
$2.65
VFC:
30.01
SWK:
32.63
VFC:
0.70
SWK:
0.87
VFC:
$9.58B
SWK:
$15.13B
VFC:
$5.16B
SWK:
$4.52B
VFC:
$961.05M
SWK:
$1.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VFC vs. SWK — Risk / Return Rank
VFC
SWK
VFC vs. SWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for V.F. Corporation (VFC) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VFC | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.53 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.25 | 3.39 | +0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VFC vs. SWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VFC drawdown since its inception was -88.41%, which is greater than SWK's maximum drawdown of -71.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VFC and SWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VFC | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.41% | -71.31% | -17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.57% | -26.14% | +0.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.66% | -48.31% | -15.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.78% | -69.86% | -16.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.41% | -71.31% | -17.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -79.14% | -53.04% | -26.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.69% | -19.48% | -2.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | 11.76% | -0.30% |
Volatility
VFC vs. SWK - Volatility Comparison
V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a higher volatility of 13.62% compared to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) at 10.72%. This indicates that VFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VFC | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.62% | 10.72% | +2.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.11% | 27.63% | +3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.45% | 38.09% | +10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 53.67% | 37.80% | +15.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.02% | 36.76% | +8.26% |
Dividends
VFC vs. SWK - Dividend Comparison
VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, less than SWK's 3.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 3.85% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.11% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
VFC vs. SWK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between V.F. Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VFC vs. SWK - Profitability Comparison
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 289.05M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 366.80M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of 300.85M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 158.20M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VFC and SWK have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VFC has higher volatility (13.62%) compared to SWK (10.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VFC dropped -88.41% vs SWK's -71.31%.
SWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VFC and SWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer