PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LEA vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LEA vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lear Corporation (LEA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LEA achieves a 20.65% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LEA has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 4.66%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.53% annualized return.


LEA

1D
-2.86%
1M
-1.72%
YTD
20.65%
6M
18.11%
1Y
54.07%
3Y*
2.77%
5Y*
-2.87%
10Y*
4.66%

SPY

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.36%
YTD
8.15%
6M
7.20%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.68%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LEA vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LEA
Lear Corporation
20.65%24.86%-31.17%16.40%-30.70%16.20%16.90%14.38%-29.29%35.23%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
8.15%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between LEA and SPY is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2009

0.57

The correlation between LEA and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (3 years) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LEA vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LEA
LEA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
LEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LEA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
LEA Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LEA vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lear Corporation (LEA) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LEASPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.34

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

2.67

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.91

11.92

-5.01

LEA vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LEA Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LEA and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LEA vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LEA drawdown since its inception was -64.51%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LEA and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LEASPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.51%

-55.19%

-9.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.98%

-8.88%

-10.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.42%

-18.76%

-30.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.83%

-24.50%

-33.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.51%

-33.72%

-30.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.02%

-3.17%

-20.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.83%

-9.04%

-10.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.85%

1.98%

+5.87%

Volatility

LEA vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Lear Corporation (LEA) has a higher volatility of 8.63% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.87%. This indicates that LEA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LEASPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.63%

4.87%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.64%

9.85%

+14.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.76%

12.50%

+20.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.05%

17.15%

+16.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.35%

17.95%

+17.40%

Dividends

LEA vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

LEA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LEA
Lear Corporation
2.25%2.69%3.25%2.18%2.48%0.97%0.64%2.19%2.28%1.13%0.91%0.81%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


LEA and SPY have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LEA has higher volatility (8.63%) compared to SPY (4.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LEA dropped -64.51% vs SPY's -55.19%.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LEA and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer