CI vs. CB
Compare and contrast key facts about Cigna Corporation (CI) and Chubb Limited (CB).
Performance
CI vs. CB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CI vs. CB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | -2.55% | 1.72% | -6.27% | -7.97% | 46.68% | 12.29% | 1.83% | 7.70% | -6.46% | 52.29% |
CB Chubb Limited | 4.73% | 14.46% | 23.89% | 4.20% | 15.97% | 27.85% | 1.41% | 22.94% | -9.63% | 12.82% |
Fundamentals
CI:
$70.94B
CB:
$129.23B
CI:
$22.28
CB:
$25.61
CI:
11.97
CB:
12.73
CI:
0.69
CB:
0.85
CI:
0.26
CB:
2.81
CI:
1.70
CB:
1.62
CI:
$274.95B
CB:
$46.59B
CI:
$25.99B
CB:
$12.47B
CI:
$12.17B
CB:
$10.09B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a -2.55% return, which is significantly lower than CB's 4.73% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has underperformed CB with an annualized return of 7.90%, while CB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.
CI
- 1D
- 3.36%
- 1M
- -7.45%
- YTD
- -2.55%
- 6M
- -6.43%
- 1Y
- -17.21%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- 3.84%
- 10Y*
- 7.90%
CB
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- -4.10%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 16.18%
- 1Y
- 9.33%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 17.20%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CI vs. CB — Risk / Return Rank
CI
CB
CI vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CI | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | 0.48 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | 0.79 | -1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.10 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 0.97 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.14 | 1.93 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CI | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 | 0.48 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.85 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | 0.53 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.40 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between CI and CB is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CI vs. CB - Dividend Comparison
CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, more than CB's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 2.28% | 2.19% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% |
CB Chubb Limited | 1.19% | 1.22% | 1.30% | 1.51% | 1.49% | 1.65% | 2.01% | 1.91% | 2.24% | 1.93% | 2.07% | 4.23% |
Drawdowns
CI vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -50.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and CB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CI | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.34% | -50.99% | -33.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.41% | -11.76% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.10% | -19.26% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.47% | -42.59% | +0.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.07% | -4.63% | -20.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -10.71% | -8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.19% | 5.89% | +8.30% |
Volatility
CI vs. CB - Volatility Comparison
Cigna Corporation (CI) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 4.79%. This indicates that CI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CI | CB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.29% | 4.79% | +3.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.62% | 13.06% | +14.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.11% | 19.81% | +13.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.13% | 20.41% | +7.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.71% | 23.68% | +7.03% |
Financials
CI vs. CB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities