PortfoliosLab logo
CI vs. CB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CI and CB is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CI vs. CB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cigna Corporation (CI) and Chubb Limited (CB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CI:

-0.31

CB:

0.79

Sortino Ratio

CI:

-0.33

CB:

1.15

Omega Ratio

CI:

0.96

CB:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

CI:

-0.37

CB:

1.13

Martin Ratio

CI:

-0.82

CB:

2.75

Ulcer Index

CI:

12.16%

CB:

5.91%

Daily Std Dev

CI:

27.43%

CB:

21.60%

Max Drawdown

CI:

-84.34%

CB:

-64.24%

Current Drawdown

CI:

-15.04%

CB:

-3.44%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CI:

$81.04B

CB:

$112.76B

EPS

CI:

$17.93

CB:

$20.77

PE Ratio

CI:

16.92

CB:

13.55

PEG Ratio

CI:

0.59

CB:

2.44

PS Ratio

CI:

0.32

CB:

2.00

PB Ratio

CI:

2.00

CB:

1.74

Total Revenue (TTM)

CI:

$254.47B

CB:

$56.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CI:

$254.47B

CB:

$56.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

CI:

$11.02B

CB:

$11.55B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 12.40% return, which is significantly higher than CB's 6.03% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has underperformed CB with an annualized return of 9.61%, while CB has yielded a comparatively higher 12.59% annualized return.


CI

YTD

12.40%

1M

-6.02%

6M

-3.77%

1Y

-8.48%

5Y*

11.86%

10Y*

9.61%

CB

YTD

6.03%

1M

2.55%

6M

2.44%

1Y

16.97%

5Y*

26.25%

10Y*

12.59%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CI vs. CB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CI is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CI is 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CI is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CI is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CI is 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CI is 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

CB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CB is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CB is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CB is 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CB is 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CB is 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CB is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CI vs. CB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and Chubb Limited (CB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CI Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the CB Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CI and CB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CI vs. CB - Dividend Comparison

CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than CB's 1.25% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CI
Cigna Corporation
1.85%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.04%
CB
Chubb Limited
1.25%1.30%1.51%1.49%1.65%2.01%1.91%2.24%1.93%2.07%2.28%2.79%

Drawdowns

CI vs. CB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, which is greater than CB's maximum drawdown of -64.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and CB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CI vs. CB - Volatility Comparison

Cigna Corporation (CI) has a higher volatility of 8.70% compared to Chubb Limited (CB) at 7.11%. This indicates that CI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CI vs. CB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and Chubb Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20212022202320242025
65.50B
13.48B
(CI) Total Revenue
(CB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CI vs. CB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cigna Corporation and Chubb Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

80.0%85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(CI) Gross Margin
(CB) Gross Margin
CI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 65.50B and revenue of 65.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chubb Limited reported a gross profit of 13.48B and revenue of 13.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 1.65B and revenue of 65.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

CB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chubb Limited reported an operating income of 1.66B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.3%.

CI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 65.50B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

CB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Chubb Limited reported a net income of 1.33B and revenue of 13.48B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.