PortfoliosLab logo
CI vs. HUM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CI and HUM is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

CI vs. HUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cigna Corporation (CI) and Humana Inc. (HUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CI:

-0.14

HUM:

-0.76

Sortino Ratio

CI:

-0.10

HUM:

-0.80

Omega Ratio

CI:

0.99

HUM:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

CI:

-0.21

HUM:

-0.51

Martin Ratio

CI:

-0.47

HUM:

-1.10

Ulcer Index

CI:

12.15%

HUM:

27.46%

Daily Std Dev

CI:

27.70%

HUM:

42.86%

Max Drawdown

CI:

-84.34%

HUM:

-85.10%

Current Drawdown

CI:

-11.72%

HUM:

-56.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CI:

$82.51B

HUM:

$27.45B

EPS

CI:

$17.93

HUM:

$14.17

PE Ratio

CI:

17.23

HUM:

16.05

PEG Ratio

CI:

0.60

HUM:

0.70

PS Ratio

CI:

0.32

HUM:

0.23

PB Ratio

CI:

2.05

HUM:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

CI:

$254.47B

HUM:

$120.26B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CI:

$254.47B

HUM:

$120.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

CI:

$11.02B

HUM:

$4.12B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than HUM's -5.90% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has outperformed HUM with an annualized return of 9.99%, while HUM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.74% annualized return.


CI

YTD

16.79%

1M

-2.58%

6M

0.73%

1Y

-3.77%

5Y*

12.71%

10Y*

9.99%

HUM

YTD

-5.90%

1M

-16.68%

6M

-13.09%

1Y

-32.20%

5Y*

-9.08%

10Y*

3.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CI vs. HUM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CI is 3737
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CI is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CI is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CI is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CI is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CI is 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

HUM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HUM is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HUM is 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HUM is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HUM is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HUM is 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HUM is 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CI vs. HUM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and Humana Inc. (HUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CI Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the HUM Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CI and HUM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CI vs. HUM - Dividend Comparison

CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, more than HUM's 1.49% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CI
Cigna Corporation
1.78%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.04%
HUM
Humana Inc.
1.49%1.40%0.77%0.62%0.60%0.61%0.60%0.70%0.76%0.43%0.64%0.77%

Drawdowns

CI vs. HUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, roughly equal to the maximum HUM drawdown of -85.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and HUM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CI vs. HUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cigna Corporation (CI) is 9.63%, while Humana Inc. (HUM) has a volatility of 16.86%. This indicates that CI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CI vs. HUM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and Humana Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B70.00B20212022202320242025
65.50B
32.11B
(CI) Total Revenue
(HUM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CI vs. HUM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cigna Corporation and Humana Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(CI) Gross Margin
(HUM) Gross Margin
CI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cigna Corporation reported a gross profit of 65.50B and revenue of 65.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

HUM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.11B and revenue of 32.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

CI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cigna Corporation reported an operating income of 1.65B and revenue of 65.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.

HUM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported an operating income of 2.01B and revenue of 32.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.3%.

CI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cigna Corporation reported a net income of 1.32B and revenue of 65.50B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

HUM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Humana Inc. reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 32.11B, resulting in a net margin of 3.9%.