PortfoliosLab logo
CI vs. MCK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CI and MCK is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.4

Performance

CI vs. MCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cigna Corporation (CI) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8,590.78%
1,591.15%
CI
MCK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CI:

-0.12

MCK:

1.15

Sortino Ratio

CI:

0.01

MCK:

1.56

Omega Ratio

CI:

1.00

MCK:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

CI:

-0.12

MCK:

1.31

Martin Ratio

CI:

-0.27

MCK:

3.22

Ulcer Index

CI:

12.14%

MCK:

9.71%

Daily Std Dev

CI:

26.75%

MCK:

27.32%

Max Drawdown

CI:

-84.34%

MCK:

-82.83%

Current Drawdown

CI:

-7.75%

MCK:

-3.06%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CI:

$91.01B

MCK:

$86.28B

EPS

CI:

$12.12

MCK:

$21.81

PE Ratio

CI:

27.70

MCK:

31.56

PEG Ratio

CI:

0.65

MCK:

1.19

PS Ratio

CI:

0.37

MCK:

0.25

PB Ratio

CI:

2.22

MCK:

5.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

CI:

$188.97B

MCK:

$268.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CI:

$188.97B

MCK:

$9.49B

EBITDA (TTM)

CI:

$8.34B

MCK:

$3.54B

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CI having a 22.04% return and MCK slightly higher at 22.08%. Over the past 10 years, CI has underperformed MCK with an annualized return of 10.65%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.


CI

YTD

22.04%

1M

4.40%

6M

6.81%

1Y

-3.78%

5Y*

13.95%

10Y*

10.65%

MCK

YTD

22.08%

1M

4.82%

6M

37.28%

1Y

29.31%

5Y*

38.85%

10Y*

12.68%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CI vs. MCK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CI
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CI is 4242
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CI is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CI is 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CI is 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CI is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CI is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

MCK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCK is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCK is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCK is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCK is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCK is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCK is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CI vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for CI, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
CI: -0.12
MCK: 1.15
The chart of Sortino ratio for CI, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
CI: 0.01
MCK: 1.56
The chart of Omega ratio for CI, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
CI: 1.00
MCK: 1.26
The chart of Calmar ratio for CI, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.00
CI: -0.12
MCK: 1.31
The chart of Martin ratio for CI, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
CI: -0.27
MCK: 3.22

The current CI Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the MCK Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CI and MCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.12
1.15
CI
MCK

Dividends

CI vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison

CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, more than MCK's 0.40% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CI
Cigna Corporation
1.70%2.03%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.04%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.40%0.47%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%0.46%

Drawdowns

CI vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, roughly equal to the maximum MCK drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and MCK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-7.75%
-3.06%
CI
MCK

Volatility

CI vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cigna Corporation (CI) is 8.01%, while McKesson Corporation (MCK) has a volatility of 8.93%. This indicates that CI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.01%
8.93%
CI
MCK

Financials

CI vs. MCK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items