CI vs. MCK
Compare and contrast key facts about Cigna Corporation (CI) and McKesson Corporation (MCK).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CI or MCK.
Correlation
The correlation between CI and MCK is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CI vs. MCK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CI:
-0.28
MCK:
1.14
CI:
-0.23
MCK:
1.56
CI:
0.97
MCK:
1.26
CI:
-0.27
MCK:
1.25
CI:
-0.60
MCK:
3.09
CI:
12.15%
MCK:
9.65%
CI:
25.72%
MCK:
26.27%
CI:
-84.34%
MCK:
-82.83%
CI:
-8.70%
MCK:
0.00%
Fundamentals
CI:
$89.74B
MCK:
$86.92B
CI:
$12.11
MCK:
$21.83
CI:
27.33
MCK:
31.77
CI:
1.00
MCK:
1.16
CI:
$189.89B
MCK:
$268.23B
CI:
$170.84B
MCK:
$9.49B
CI:
$8.32B
MCK:
$3.54B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 20.79% return, which is significantly lower than MCK's 21.83% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has underperformed MCK with an annualized return of 10.63%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively higher 12.90% annualized return.
CI
20.79%
7.08%
-1.69%
-7.01%
16.95%
10.63%
MCK
21.83%
7.60%
42.21%
30.65%
41.93%
12.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CI vs. MCK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CI
MCK
CI vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CI vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison
CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, more than MCK's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI Cigna Corporation | 1.72% | 2.03% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.04% |
MCK McKesson Corporation | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.54% | 0.72% | 0.95% | 1.16% | 1.32% | 0.80% | 0.80% | 0.53% | 0.46% |
Drawdowns
CI vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, roughly equal to the maximum MCK drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and MCK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CI vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison
Cigna Corporation (CI) has a higher volatility of 6.00% compared to McKesson Corporation (MCK) at 4.66%. This indicates that CI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
CI vs. MCK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities