PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CI vs. MCK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CI vs. MCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cigna Corporation (CI) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%7,000.00%8,000.00%9,000.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8,159.99%
4,980.74%
CI
MCK

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CI achieves a 8.68% return, which is significantly lower than MCK's 31.42% return. Over the past 10 years, CI has outperformed MCK with an annualized return of 12.93%, while MCK has yielded a comparatively lower 12.20% annualized return.


CI

YTD

8.68%

1M

-4.31%

6M

-4.32%

1Y

15.72%

5Y (annualized)

11.44%

10Y (annualized)

12.93%

MCK

YTD

31.42%

1M

18.66%

6M

7.65%

1Y

35.16%

5Y (annualized)

33.59%

10Y (annualized)

12.20%

Fundamentals


CIMCK
Market Cap$94.54B$78.41B
EPS$10.54$19.33
PE Ratio32.2531.95
PEG Ratio0.821.30
Total Revenue (TTM)$230.67B$330.19B
Gross Profit (TTM)$192.91B$13.02B
EBITDA (TTM)$3.78B$3.74B

Key characteristics


CIMCK
Sharpe Ratio0.551.39
Sortino Ratio1.081.78
Omega Ratio1.161.33
Calmar Ratio0.681.53
Martin Ratio2.553.95
Ulcer Index6.08%9.25%
Daily Std Dev28.30%26.17%
Max Drawdown-84.34%-82.83%
Current Drawdown-12.36%-3.70%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between CI and MCK is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CI vs. MCK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cigna Corporation (CI) and McKesson Corporation (MCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CI, currently valued at 0.55, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.551.39
The chart of Sortino ratio for CI, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.081.78
The chart of Omega ratio for CI, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.161.33
The chart of Calmar ratio for CI, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.681.53
The chart of Martin ratio for CI, currently valued at 2.55, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.002.553.95
CI
MCK

The current CI Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the MCK Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CI and MCK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.55
1.39
CI
MCK

Dividends

CI vs. MCK - Dividend Comparison

CI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than MCK's 0.42% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
CI
Cigna Corporation
1.69%1.64%1.35%1.74%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.04%0.05%
MCK
McKesson Corporation
0.42%0.50%0.54%0.72%0.95%1.16%1.32%0.80%0.80%0.53%0.46%0.55%

Drawdowns

CI vs. MCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CI drawdown since its inception was -84.34%, roughly equal to the maximum MCK drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CI and MCK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-12.36%
-3.70%
CI
MCK

Volatility

CI vs. MCK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cigna Corporation (CI) is 11.38%, while McKesson Corporation (MCK) has a volatility of 12.37%. This indicates that CI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.38%
12.37%
CI
MCK

Financials

CI vs. MCK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cigna Corporation and McKesson Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items