PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRI vs. TDTT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRI vs. TDTT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRI achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than TDTT's 1.81% return.


LDRI

1D
0.00%
1M
0.02%
YTD
1.92%
6M
2.12%
1Y
4.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TDTT

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
1.81%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.65%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
3.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRI vs. TDTT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDRI and TDTT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2024

0.66

The correlation between LDRI and TDTT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRI vs. TDTT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRI
LDRI Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LDRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRI Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

TDTT
TDTT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TDTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TDTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDTT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRI vs. TDTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LDRITDTTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

2.54

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.67

4.20

-0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.51

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.56

5.17

+2.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.35

16.59

+3.76

LDRI vs. TDTT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRI Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the TDTT Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRI and TDTT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LDRITDTTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.54

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.26

0.69

+1.57

Drawdowns

LDRI vs. TDTT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRI drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum TDTT drawdown of -6.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRI and TDTT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRITDTTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-6.97%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.60%

-0.90%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-0.14%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-1.60%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

0.28%

-0.06%

Volatility

LDRI vs. TDTT - Volatility Comparison

iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund (TDTT) have volatilities of 0.46% and 0.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRITDTTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.46%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.38%

1.21%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.88%

1.85%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.28%

3.67%

-1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.28%

3.38%

-1.10%

LDRI vs. TDTT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TDTT's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDRI vs. TDTT - Dividend Comparison

LDRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than TDTT's 4.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LDRI
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF
3.52%4.23%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TDTT
FlexShares iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS Index Fund
4.54%4.52%4.01%3.88%6.97%4.53%1.15%1.91%2.48%1.88%1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRI and TDTT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TDTT has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to LDRI (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRI dropped -0.85% vs TDTT's -6.97%.

On 1-year performance, TDTT leads with 4.65% vs 4.51% for LDRI. On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TDTT has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for TDTT.

TDTT has the higher dividend yield at 4.54%, compared with 3.52% for LDRI.

LDRI tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index, while TDTT tracks iBoxx 3-Year Target Duration TIPS. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LDRI and 0.18% for TDTT.

TDTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRI and TDTT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer