LDRI vs. SCHP
LDRI (iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - LDRI tracks the BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index while SCHP tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LDRI returned 3.78% vs 3.57% for SCHP. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LDRI charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
LDRI vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDRI achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 0.81% return.
LDRI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 3.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHP
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 0.92%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
LDRI vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 1.37% | 5.94% | 0.10% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 0.81% | 6.76% | -1.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDRI and SCHP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between LDRI and SCHP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDRI vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
LDRI
SCHP
LDRI vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LDRI | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.19 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.33 | 1.86 | +4.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.42 | 5.54 | +10.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LDRI vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDRI drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum SCHP drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRI and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDRI | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -14.26% | +13.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.60% | -1.93% | +1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -1.04% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.20% | -3.93% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.65% | -0.42% |
Volatility
LDRI vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) is 0.66%, while Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) has a volatility of 1.20%. This indicates that LDRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDRI | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 1.20% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.48% | 2.39% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.96% | 3.35% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.29% | 6.11% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.29% | 5.60% | -3.31% |
LDRI vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LDRI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LDRI vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
LDRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than SCHP's 4.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDRI iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF | 3.54% | 4.23% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 4.02% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LDRI and SCHP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHP has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to LDRI (0.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRI dropped -0.85% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 1-year performance, LDRI leads with 3.78% vs 3.57% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, LDRI has been the lower-risk option at 0.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LDRI has performed better with a 3.78% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for LDRI.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 3.54% for LDRI.
LDRI tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LDRI and 0.03% for SCHP.
LDRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDRI and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer