PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LDRI vs. GTIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LDRI vs. GTIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LDRI achieves a 1.37% return, which is significantly higher than GTIP's 0.87% return.


LDRI

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
1.37%
6M
1.71%
1Y
3.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GTIP

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
0.87%
6M
0.85%
1Y
3.48%
3Y*
3.62%
5Y*
0.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LDRI vs. GTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LDRI and GTIP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2024

0.56

The correlation between LDRI and GTIP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LDRI vs. GTIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LDRI
LDRI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LDRI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LDRI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LDRI Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LDRI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
LDRI Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

GTIP
GTIP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GTIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GTIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GTIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
GTIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
GTIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LDRI vs. GTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LDRIGTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.19

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.96

1.74

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.28

5.38

+9.90

LDRI vs. GTIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LDRI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the GTIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LDRI and GTIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LDRI vs. GTIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LDRI drawdown since its inception was -0.85%, smaller than the maximum GTIP drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDRI and GTIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LDRIGTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.85%

-14.31%

+13.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.60%

-2.02%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-0.98%

+0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-4.21%

+4.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

0.65%

-0.42%

Volatility

LDRI vs. GTIP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF (LDRI) is 0.64%, while Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) has a volatility of 1.15%. This indicates that LDRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LDRIGTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.64%

1.15%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

2.46%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95%

3.36%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.29%

6.05%

-3.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.29%

6.00%

-3.71%

LDRI vs. GTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

LDRI has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GTIP's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LDRI vs. GTIP - Dividend Comparison

LDRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than GTIP's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GTIP
Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF
4.73%4.58%3.52%2.77%6.47%3.82%1.04%2.34%0.66%
LDRI
iShares iBonds 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder ETF
3.54%4.23%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LDRI and GTIP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GTIP has higher volatility (1.15%) compared to LDRI (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDRI dropped -0.85% vs GTIP's -14.31%.

On 1-year performance, LDRI leads with 3.55% vs 3.48% for GTIP. On fees, LDRI is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, LDRI has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LDRI has performed better with a 3.55% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LDRI is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for GTIP.

GTIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 3.54% for LDRI.

LDRI tracks BlackRock iBonds® 1-5 Year TIPS Ladder Index, while GTIP tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for LDRI and 0.12% for GTIP.

LDRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LDRI and GTIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer