LDOS vs. CLS
LDOS (Leidos Holdings, Inc.) and CLS (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LDOS in Information Technology Services, CLS in Electronic Components. Over the past 10 years, LDOS returned 15.01%/yr vs 43.16%/yr for CLS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LDOS vs. CLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LDOS achieves a -31.76% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's 30.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LDOS has underperformed CLS with an annualized return of 15.01%, while CLS has yielded a comparatively higher 43.16% annualized return.
LDOS
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- -31.76%
- 6M
- -33.53%
- 1Y
- -16.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.53%
- 10Y*
- 15.01%
CLS
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- YTD
- 30.75%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 220.14%
- 3Y*
- 209.55%
- 5Y*
- 114.81%
- 10Y*
- 43.16%
LDOS vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | -31.76% | 26.50% | 34.52% | 4.50% | 20.04% | -14.20% | 8.95% | 88.82% | -16.72% | 29.14% |
CLS Celestica Inc. | 30.75% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -16.32% | -11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LDOS and CLS is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LDOS and CLS has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
LDOS:
$15.72B
CLS:
$44.72B
LDOS:
$10.92
CLS:
$8.28
LDOS:
11.25
CLS:
46.65
LDOS:
0.09
CLS:
0.63
LDOS:
0.92
CLS:
3.24
LDOS:
3.14
CLS:
21.31
LDOS:
$17.33B
CLS:
$13.81B
LDOS:
$3.04B
CLS:
$1.60B
LDOS:
$2.34B
CLS:
$1.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LDOS vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank
LDOS
CLS
LDOS vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LDOS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.39 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 7.58 | -8.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.12 | 18.88 | -20.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LDOS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 3.06 | -3.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 2.01 | -1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.87 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.27 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
LDOS vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LDOS drawdown since its inception was -54.72%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -96.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LDOS and CLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LDOS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.72% | -96.93% | +42.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.17% | -29.24% | -8.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.17% | -53.96% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.17% | -53.96% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.29% | -80.60% | +38.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.17% | -18.18% | -19.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.67% | -73.36% | +53.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.55% | 11.72% | +2.83% |
Volatility
LDOS vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is 7.17%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 26.60%. This indicates that LDOS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LDOS | CLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 26.60% | -19.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.18% | 55.08% | -29.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.33% | 72.52% | -43.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.74% | 57.62% | -30.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.50% | 49.93% | -22.43% |
Dividends
LDOS vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison
LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDOS Leidos Holdings, Inc. | 1.35% | 0.90% | 1.07% | 1.35% | 1.37% | 1.57% | 1.29% | 1.35% | 2.43% | 1.98% | 29.17% | 3.41% |
Financials
LDOS vs. CLS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Leidos Holdings, Inc. and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LDOS vs. CLS - Profitability Comparison
LDOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 761.00M and revenue of 4.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.3%.
CLS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
LDOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 508.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.
CLS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
LDOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 328.00M and revenue of 4.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.5%.
CLS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LDOS and CLS have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (26.60%) compared to LDOS (7.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LDOS dropped -54.72% vs CLS's -96.93%.
CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LDOS and CLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer