LCTU vs. RSBY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock, while RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LCTU returned 24.65% vs 13.61% for RSBY. At a correlation of -0.20, they often move in opposite directions. LCTU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for RSBY.

Performance

LCTU vs. RSBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a 7.96% return, which is significantly lower than RSBY's 18.30% return.

LCTU

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 7.96%
• 6M: 7.31%
• 1Y: 24.65%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: 12.05%
• 10Y*: —

RSBY

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 18.30%
• 6M: 18.77%
• 1Y: 13.61%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTU vs. RSBY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	7.96%	16.96%	5.80%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.30%	-12.98%	-7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTU and RSBY is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	-0.20

Return for Risk

LCTU vs. RSBY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTU

LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 59
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 59
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 65

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 33
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 31
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTU vs. RSBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCTU	RSBY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.21	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	1.77	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.21	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.64	1.72	+0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.44	4.09	+7.35

LCTU vs. RSBY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the RSBY Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and RSBY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. RSBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, which is greater than RSBY's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and RSBY.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTU	RSBY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.93%	-23.32%	-2.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-7.95%	-1.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-6.63%	+4.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.28%	-13.56%	+7.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	3.45%	-1.29%

Volatility

LCTU vs. RSBY - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) has a higher volatility of 4.43% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) at 1.98%. This indicates that LCTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTU	RSBY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.43%	1.98%	+2.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.06%	8.25%	+1.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.79%	11.33%	+1.46%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.22%	13.41%	+3.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	13.41%	+3.62%

LCTU vs. RSBY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RSBY's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCTU vs. RSBY - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than RSBY's 1.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	0.97%	1.02%	1.27%	1.46%	1.63%	2.20%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.75%	2.07%	2.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCTU and RSBY in my portfolio?

LCTU and RSBY have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCTU or RSBY?

LCTU has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to RSBY (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTU dropped -25.93% vs RSBY's -23.32%.

Which ETF is better, LCTU or RSBY?

On 1-year performance, LCTU leads with 24.65% vs 13.61% for RSBY. On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCTU or RSBY?

Over the 1-year period, LCTU has performed better with a 24.65% return vs 13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCTU or RSBY?

LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCTU or RSBY?

RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 0.97% for LCTU.

What is the main difference between LCTU and RSBY?

LCTU is categorized as ESG, while RSBY is Multistrategy. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LCTU and 0.98% for RSBY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.