RSBY vs. RSBA

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) and RSBA (Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while RSBA is a Leveraged Bonds fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSBY returned 20.23% vs 4.91% for RSBA. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RSBY charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for RSBA.

Performance

RSBY vs. RSBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RSBY achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly higher than RSBA's -0.07% return.

RSBY

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: 18.23%
• 6M: 14.22%
• 1Y: 20.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RSBA

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: -0.07%
• 6M: -0.24%
• 1Y: 4.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RSBY vs. RSBA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	18.23%	-12.98%	-0.41%
RSBA Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF	-0.07%	7.73%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between RSBY and RSBA is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	0.39

Return for Risk

RSBY vs. RSBA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RSBY

RSBY Risk / Return Rank: 46
RSBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RSBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
RSBY Omega Ratio Rank: 47
RSBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
RSBY Martin Ratio Rank: 36

RSBA

RSBA Risk / Return Rank: 30
RSBA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
RSBA Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RSBA Omega Ratio Rank: 27
RSBA Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
RSBA Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RSBY vs. RSBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RSBY	RSBA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.72	1.08	+0.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	1.60	+0.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.19	+0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	1.72	+0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.70	4.78	+0.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RSBY vs. RSBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RSBY Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is higher than the RSBA Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RSBY and RSBA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RSBY	RSBA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72	1.08	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.22	1.03	-1.26

Drawdowns

RSBY vs. RSBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RSBY drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than RSBA's maximum drawdown of -2.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBY and RSBA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RSBY	RSBA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-2.83%	-20.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.95%	-2.74%	-5.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.68%	-1.39%	-5.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.81%	-0.81%	-13.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	0.99%	+2.39%

Volatility

RSBY vs. RSBA - Volatility Comparison

Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF (RSBA) at 1.39%. This indicates that RSBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RSBY	RSBA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.98%	1.39%	+0.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.66%	3.32%	+5.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.82%	4.58%	+7.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.56%	5.08%	+8.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.56%	5.08%	+8.48%

RSBY vs. RSBA - Expense Ratio Comparison

RSBY has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than RSBA's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

RSBY vs. RSBA - Dividend Comparison

RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than RSBA's 3.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
RSBA Return Stacked Bonds & Merger Arbitrage ETF	3.37%	3.37%	0.01%
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF	1.75%	2.07%	2.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RSBY and RSBA in my portfolio?

RSBY and RSBA have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RSBY or RSBA?

RSBY has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to RSBA (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBY dropped -23.32% vs RSBA's -2.83%.

Which ETF is better, RSBY or RSBA?

On 1-year performance, RSBY leads with 20.23% vs 4.91% for RSBA. On fees, RSBA is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, RSBA has been the lower-risk option at 1.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RSBY or RSBA?

Over the 1-year period, RSBY has performed better with a 20.23% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RSBY or RSBA?

RSBA is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RSBY or RSBA?

RSBA has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.75% for RSBY.

What is the main difference between RSBY and RSBA?

RSBY is categorized as Multistrategy, while RSBA is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for RSBY and 0.96% for RSBA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.