RSBY vs. RSSX
RSBY (Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF) and RSSX (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RSBY is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Return Stacked, while RSSX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by Return Stacked. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RSBY returned 20.23% vs 31.76% for RSSX. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. RSBY charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for RSSX.
Performance
RSBY vs. RSSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RSBY achieves a 18.23% return, which is significantly higher than RSSX's 3.53% return.
RSBY
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- 18.23%
- 6M
- 14.22%
- 1Y
- 20.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSSX
- 1D
- -1.76%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 3.53%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 31.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RSBY vs. RSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 18.23% | 0.86% |
RSSX Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF | 3.53% | 29.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between RSBY and RSSX is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RSBY vs. RSSX — Risk / Return Rank
RSBY
RSSX
RSBY vs. RSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RSBY | RSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.72 | 1.01 | +0.72 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 1.46 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.19 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RSBY | RSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 1.01 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.22 | 1.08 | -1.31 |
Drawdowns
RSBY vs. RSSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RSBY drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum RSSX drawdown of -27.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RSBY and RSSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RSBY | RSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.32% | -27.37% | +4.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.95% | -27.37% | +19.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.68% | -13.53% | +6.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.81% | -6.69% | -7.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 9.44% | -6.06% |
Volatility
RSBY vs. RSSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF (RSBY) is 1.98%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF (RSSX) has a volatility of 7.69%. This indicates that RSBY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RSBY | RSSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.98% | 7.69% | -5.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 26.81% | -18.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.82% | 31.78% | -19.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 31.78% | -18.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.56% | 31.78% | -18.22% |
RSBY vs. RSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RSBY has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than RSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
RSBY vs. RSSX - Dividend Comparison
RSBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than RSSX's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
RSBY Return Stacked Bonds & Futures Yield ETF | 1.75% | 2.07% | 2.29% |
RSSX Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Gold/Bitcoin ETF | 1.49% | 1.54% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RSBY and RSSX have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSSX has higher volatility (7.69%) compared to RSBY (1.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RSBY dropped -23.32% vs RSSX's -27.37%.
On 1-year performance, RSSX leads with 31.76% vs 20.23% for RSBY. On fees, RSSX is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, RSBY has been the lower-risk option at 1.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RSSX has performed better with a 31.76% return vs 20.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RSSX is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for RSBY.
RSBY has the higher dividend yield at 1.75%, compared with 1.49% for RSSX.
RSBY is categorized as Multistrategy, while RSSX is Diversified Portfolio. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for RSBY and 0.68% for RSSX.
RSBY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RSBY and RSSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer