PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTU vs. PMMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCTU vs. PMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCTU vs. PMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly lower than PMMF's 0.88% return.


LCTU

1D
0.83%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
-4.34%
6M
-2.35%
1Y
17.34%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10Y*

PMMF

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.88%
6M
1.88%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCTU vs. PMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PMMF's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LCTU vs. PMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTU
LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PMMF
PMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTU vs. PMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTUPMMFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

13.41

-12.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

25.32

-23.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

11.73

-10.52

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

31.58

-30.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.59

380.28

-373.69

LCTU vs. PMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the PMMF Sharpe Ratio of 13.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and PMMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTUPMMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

13.41

-12.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

11.54

-10.93

Correlation

The correlation between LCTU and PMMF is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LCTU vs. PMMF - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than PMMF's 3.88% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
1.06%1.02%1.27%1.46%1.63%2.20%
PMMF
iShares Prime Money Market ETF
3.88%3.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. PMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, which is greater than PMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and PMMF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTUPMMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

-0.13%

-25.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-0.13%

-12.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.99%

0.00%

-5.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

0.00%

-6.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

0.01%

+2.71%

Volatility

LCTU vs. PMMF - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) at 0.05%. This indicates that LCTU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCTUPMMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

0.05%

+5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

0.13%

+9.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

0.31%

+18.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

0.36%

+16.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

0.36%

+16.80%