LCTU vs. BPAY

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BPAY is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCTU returned 19.06%/yr vs 9.98%/yr for BPAY. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCTU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BPAY.

Performance

LCTU vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a 9.64% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -0.95% return.

LCTU

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 0.99%
• 6M: 8.15%
• YTD: 9.64%
• 1Y: 20.56%
• 3Y*: 19.06%
• 5Y*: 12.02%
• 10Y*: —

BPAY

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: 7.86%
• 6M: -0.87%
• YTD: -0.95%
• 1Y: -13.26%
• 3Y*: 9.98%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTU vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	9.64%	16.96%	24.00%	25.38%	-10.08%
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	-0.95%	8.54%	17.28%	13.19%	-16.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTU and BPAY is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022	0.78

The correlation between LCTU and BPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

LCTU vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LCTU	BPAY
Technology	36.4%	30.5%
Financial Services	11.9%	58.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.8%	6.4%
Communication Services	9.4%	-
Healthcare	9.0%	-
Industrials	8.6%	5.1%
Consumer Defensive	4.4%	-
Energy	2.9%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Real Estate	2.2%	2.2%
Basic Materials	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

LCTU vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTU

LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 60
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 60
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 66

BPAY

BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 5
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTU vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCTU	BPAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.62	-0.51	+2.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	-0.56	+2.80
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.93	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	-0.40	+2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	-0.72	+10.10

LCTU vs. BPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the BPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and BPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, smaller than the maximum BPAY drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and BPAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTU	BPAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.93%	-33.62%	+7.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-33.62%	+24.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.83%	-33.62%	+13.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-16.32%	+15.91%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.21%	-10.84%	+4.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.20%	18.48%	-16.28%

Volatility

LCTU vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is 3.00%, while BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that LCTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTU	BPAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.00%	6.81%	-3.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	20.22%	-10.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	26.15%	-13.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.23%	24.49%	-7.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.95%	24.49%	-7.54%

LCTU vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCTU vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than BPAY's 6.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	6.84%	6.49%	0.48%	1.18%	0.18%	0.00%
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	0.95%	1.02%	1.27%	1.46%	1.63%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCTU and BPAY in my portfolio?

LCTU and BPAY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCTU or BPAY?

BPAY has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to LCTU (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTU dropped -25.93% vs BPAY's -33.62%.

Which ETF is better, LCTU or BPAY?

On 3-year performance, LCTU leads with 19.06% vs 9.98% for BPAY. On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LCTU has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCTU or BPAY?

Over the 3-year period, LCTU has performed better with a 19.06% return vs 9.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCTU or BPAY?

LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCTU or BPAY?

BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 6.84%, compared with 0.95% for LCTU.

What is the main difference between LCTU and BPAY?

LCTU is categorized as ESG, while BPAY is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LCTU and 0.70% for BPAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.