PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTU vs. BPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCTU vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCTU vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
-4.34%16.96%24.00%25.38%-10.30%
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
-18.60%8.54%17.28%13.19%-16.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -18.60% return.


LCTU

1D
0.83%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
-4.34%
6M
-2.35%
1Y
17.34%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
10Y*

BPAY

1D
-0.02%
1M
-7.36%
YTD
-18.60%
6M
-26.54%
1Y
-4.51%
3Y*
8.29%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCTU vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LCTU vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTU
LCTU Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LCTU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTU Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTU vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTUBPAYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

-0.15

+1.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.43

-0.02

+1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.00

+0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

-0.11

+1.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.59

-0.26

+6.85

LCTU vs. BPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTU Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the BPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTU and BPAY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTUBPAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

-0.15

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

-0.02

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between LCTU and BPAY is 0.79, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LCTU vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison

LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than BPAY's 7.97% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
LCTU
BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
1.06%1.02%1.27%1.46%1.63%2.20%
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.97%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%0.00%

Drawdowns

LCTU vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, smaller than the maximum BPAY drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and BPAY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTUBPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.93%

-33.62%

+7.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.49%

-33.62%

+21.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.99%

-31.23%

+25.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.51%

-9.88%

+3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.72%

13.77%

-11.05%

Volatility

LCTU vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is 5.44%, while BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a volatility of 7.85%. This indicates that LCTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCTUBPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.44%

7.85%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

19.02%

-9.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.77%

29.27%

-10.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.16%

24.19%

-7.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.16%

24.19%

-7.03%