LCTU vs. BPAY
LCTU (BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTU is a ESG fund actively managed by BlackRock, while BPAY is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCTU returned 21.17%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for BPAY. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCTU charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BPAY.
Performance
LCTU vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCTU achieves a 9.04% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -12.44% return.
LCTU
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.23%
- YTD
- 9.04%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 25.72%
- 3Y*
- 21.17%
- 5Y*
- 12.37%
- 10Y*
- —
BPAY
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -12.44%
- 6M
- -14.32%
- 1Y
- -10.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCTU vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 9.04% | 16.96% | 24.00% | 25.38% | -10.30% |
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | -12.44% | 8.54% | 17.28% | 13.19% | -16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCTU and BPAY is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022 | 0.78 |
The correlation between LCTU and BPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCTU vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCTU
BPAY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
LCTU
BPAY
Financial Services
LCTU
BPAY
Communication Services
LCTU
BPAY
-
Consumer Cyclical
LCTU
BPAY
Healthcare
LCTU
BPAY
-
Industrials
LCTU
BPAY
Consumer Defensive
LCTU
BPAY
-
Energy
LCTU
BPAY
-
Real Estate
LCTU
BPAY
Utilities
LCTU
BPAY
-
Basic Materials
LCTU
BPAY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCTU vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank
LCTU
BPAY
LCTU vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCTU | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 0.95 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | -0.32 | +3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.25 | -0.64 | +12.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCTU | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | -0.42 | +2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.06 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
LCTU vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCTU drawdown since its inception was -25.93%, smaller than the maximum BPAY drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTU and BPAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCTU | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.93% | -33.62% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.38% | -33.62% | +24.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.83% | -33.62% | +13.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -26.03% | +25.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.32% | -10.54% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 16.98% | -14.87% |
Volatility
LCTU vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTU) is 3.04%, while BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that LCTU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCTU | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 6.91% | -3.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.36% | 18.71% | -9.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 26.01% | -13.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.15% | 24.35% | -7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 24.35% | -7.33% |
LCTU vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCTU has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCTU vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison
LCTU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than BPAY's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 7.41% | 6.49% | 0.48% | 1.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
LCTU BlackRock U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 0.93% | 1.02% | 1.27% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCTU and BPAY have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BPAY has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to LCTU (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTU dropped -25.93% vs BPAY's -33.62%.
On 3-year performance, LCTU leads with 21.17% vs 8.49% for BPAY. On fees, LCTU is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, LCTU has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LCTU has performed better with a 21.17% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LCTU is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.
BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.93% for LCTU.
LCTU is categorized as ESG, while BPAY is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LCTU and 0.70% for BPAY.
LCTU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCTU and BPAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer