BPAY vs. FDIG
BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) and FDIG (Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPAY is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while FDIG is a Blockchain fund tracking the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index. BPAY is actively managed, while FDIG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BPAY returned 8.37%/yr vs 21.94%/yr for FDIG. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BPAY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FDIG.
Performance
BPAY vs. FDIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FDIG's 6.72% return.
BPAY
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- -11.26%
- 3Y*
- 8.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.45%
FDIG
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- 6M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 6.72%
- 1Y
- 18.46%
- 3Y*
- 21.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.23%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $137.55K | $90.06K | $56.72K | |
| $1.07M | $1.09M | $1.90M |
BPAY vs. FDIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | -1.50% | 8.54% | 17.28% | 13.19% | -16.32% |
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 6.72% | 19.92% | 18.41% | 166.00% | -44.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BPAY and FDIG is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022 | 0.65 |
The correlation between BPAY and FDIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
BPAY vs. FDIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
BPAY
FDIG
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
BPAY
FDIG
Technology
BPAY
FDIG
Consumer Cyclical
BPAY
FDIG
Industrials
BPAY
FDIG
Real Estate
BPAY
FDIG
-
Basic Materials
BPAY
-
FDIG
-
Communication Services
BPAY
-
FDIG
Consumer Defensive
BPAY
-
FDIG
-
Energy
BPAY
-
FDIG
-
Healthcare
BPAY
-
FDIG
-
Utilities
BPAY
-
FDIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BPAY vs. FDIG — Risk / Return Rank
BPAY
FDIG
BPAY vs. FDIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BPAY | FDIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.07 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.43 | 0.23 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | 0.41 | -1.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BPAY vs. FDIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum FDIG drawdown of -61.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and FDIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BPAY | FDIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.62% | -61.35% | +27.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.78% | -46.69% | +13.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.62% | -49.66% | +16.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.78% | -29.32% | +12.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.92% | -27.49% | +16.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.94% | 26.23% | -8.29% |
Volatility
BPAY vs. FDIG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) is 6.48%, while Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) has a volatility of 14.26%. This indicates that BPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BPAY | FDIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.48% | 14.26% | -7.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.38% | 37.43% | -17.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 51.34% | -25.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 60.59% | -36.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 60.59% | -36.11% |
BPAY vs. FDIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIG's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
BPAY vs. FDIG - Dividend Comparison
BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.88%, more than FDIG's 1.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 6.88% | 6.49% | 0.48% | 1.18% | 0.18% |
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF | 1.53% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 0.18% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BPAY and FDIG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FDIG has higher volatility (14.26%) compared to BPAY (6.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs FDIG's -61.35%.
On 3-year performance, FDIG leads with 21.94% vs 8.37% for BPAY. On fees, FDIG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BPAY has been the lower-risk option at 6.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FDIG has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 8.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FDIG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.
BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 6.88%, compared with 1.53% for FDIG.
BPAY is categorized as Financials Equities, while FDIG is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BPAY and 0.39% for FDIG.
FDIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BPAY and FDIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer