BPAY vs. FDIG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) and FDIG (Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPAY is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while FDIG is a Blockchain fund tracking the Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments Index. BPAY is actively managed, while FDIG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BPAY returned 9.14%/yr vs 36.48%/yr for FDIG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BPAY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FDIG.

Performance

BPAY vs. FDIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -10.19% return, which is significantly lower than FDIG's 17.50% return.

BPAY

• 1D: -1.19%
• 1M: 0.93%
• YTD: -10.19%
• 6M: -12.22%
• 1Y: -17.49%
• 3Y*: 9.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FDIG

• 1D: -1.95%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 17.50%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 44.87%
• 3Y*: 36.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPAY vs. FDIG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	-10.19%	8.54%	17.28%	13.19%	-16.32%
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF	17.50%	19.92%	18.41%	166.00%	-44.01%

Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and FDIG is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022	0.65

The correlation between BPAY and FDIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

BPAY vs. FDIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BPAY	FDIG
Financial Services	58.0%	56.8%
Technology	30.5%	39.0%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	0.4%
Industrials	5.1%	1.5%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	0.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

BPAY vs. FDIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY

BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 4
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 4

FDIG

FDIG Risk / Return Rank: 24
FDIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
FDIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
FDIG Omega Ratio Rank: 25
FDIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
FDIG Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. FDIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPAY	FDIG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.68	0.89	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.81	1.45	-2.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.17	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	0.97	-1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.98	1.82	-2.80

BPAY vs. FDIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the FDIG Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and FDIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. FDIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum FDIG drawdown of -61.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and FDIG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPAY	FDIG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.62%	-61.35%	+27.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.62%	-46.69%	+13.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.62%	-49.66%	+16.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.12%	-22.18%	-1.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.72%	-27.48%	+16.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.90%	24.69%	-6.79%

Volatility

BPAY vs. FDIG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) is 9.68%, while Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF (FDIG) has a volatility of 15.67%. This indicates that BPAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPAY	FDIG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.68%	15.67%	-5.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.74%	37.03%	-17.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.97%	50.67%	-24.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.48%	60.91%	-36.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.48%	60.91%	-36.43%

BPAY vs. FDIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDIG's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPAY vs. FDIG - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.55%, more than FDIG's 1.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	7.55%	6.49%	0.48%	1.18%	0.18%
FDIG Fidelity Crypto Industry and Digital Payments ETF	1.39%	1.14%	1.17%	0.18%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPAY and FDIG in my portfolio?

BPAY and FDIG have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPAY or FDIG?

FDIG has higher volatility (15.67%) compared to BPAY (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs FDIG's -61.35%.

Which ETF is better, BPAY or FDIG?

On 3-year performance, FDIG leads with 36.48% vs 9.14% for BPAY. On fees, FDIG is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, BPAY has been the lower-risk option at 9.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BPAY or FDIG?

Over the 3-year period, FDIG has performed better with a 36.48% return vs 9.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPAY or FDIG?

FDIG is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPAY or FDIG?

BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.55%, compared with 1.39% for FDIG.

What is the main difference between BPAY and FDIG?

BPAY is categorized as Financials Equities, while FDIG is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BPAY and 0.39% for FDIG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FDIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.