BPAY vs. IPAY

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) and IPAY (ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BPAY is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while IPAY is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Prime Mobile Payments Index. BPAY is actively managed, while IPAY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, BPAY returned 9.58%/yr vs 2.40%/yr for IPAY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BPAY charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for IPAY.

Performance

BPAY vs. IPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BPAY achieves a -9.10% return, which is significantly higher than IPAY's -15.66% return.

BPAY

• 1D: -1.54%
• 1M: 2.15%
• YTD: -9.10%
• 6M: -11.94%
• 1Y: -15.94%
• 3Y*: 9.58%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPAY

• 1D: -1.15%
• 1M: -2.98%
• YTD: -15.66%
• 6M: -17.25%
• 1Y: -21.91%
• 3Y*: 2.40%
• 5Y*: -8.82%
• 10Y*: 6.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BPAY vs. IPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	-9.10%	8.54%	17.28%	13.19%	-16.32%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	-15.66%	-9.55%	25.88%	18.21%	-15.28%

Correlation

The correlation between BPAY and IPAY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2022	0.90

The correlation between BPAY and IPAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

BPAY vs. IPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BPAY	IPAY
Financial Services	58.0%	41.8%
Technology	30.5%	53.9%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	-
Industrials	5.1%	4.3%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

BPAY vs. IPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BPAY

BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 4
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 5

IPAY

IPAY Risk / Return Rank: 2
IPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BPAY vs. IPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) and ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BPAY	IPAY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.62	-0.92	+0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.72	-1.16	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	0.86	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.48	-0.70	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.90	-1.26	+0.37

BPAY vs. IPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BPAY Sharpe Ratio is -0.62, which is higher than the IPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BPAY and IPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BPAY vs. IPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BPAY drawdown since its inception was -33.62%, smaller than the maximum IPAY drawdown of -51.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BPAY and IPAY.

Drawdown Indicators

	BPAY	IPAY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.62%	-51.75%	+18.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.62%	-31.31%	-2.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.62%	-32.74%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-51.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-51.75%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.21%	-38.94%	+15.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.71%	-16.76%	+6.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.83%	17.38%	+0.45%

Volatility

BPAY vs. IPAY - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF (IPAY) at 7.87%. This indicates that BPAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BPAY	IPAY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	7.87%	+1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.76%	18.79%	+0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.99%	23.96%	+2.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.49%	26.15%	-1.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.49%	25.43%	-0.94%

BPAY vs. IPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BPAY has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than IPAY's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BPAY vs. IPAY - Dividend Comparison

BPAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than IPAY's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF	7.46%	6.49%	0.48%	1.18%	0.18%
IPAY ETFMG Prime Mobile Payments ETF	0.94%	0.79%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BPAY and IPAY in my portfolio?

BPAY and IPAY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BPAY or IPAY?

BPAY has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to IPAY (7.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BPAY dropped -33.62% vs IPAY's -51.75%.

Which ETF is better, BPAY or IPAY?

On 3-year performance, BPAY leads with 9.58% vs 2.40% for IPAY. On fees, BPAY is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, IPAY has been the lower-risk option at 7.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BPAY or IPAY?

Over the 3-year period, BPAY has performed better with a 9.58% return vs 2.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BPAY or IPAY?

BPAY is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IPAY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BPAY or IPAY?

BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 0.94% for IPAY.

What is the main difference between BPAY and IPAY?

BPAY is categorized as Financials Equities, while IPAY is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BPAY and 0.75% for IPAY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BPAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.62 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.