PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCTD vs. NULC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCTD vs. NULC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCTD vs. NULC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
1.14%30.42%3.14%17.10%-16.16%4.36%
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
-3.28%16.29%18.71%22.54%-20.18%14.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 1.14% return, which is significantly higher than NULC's -3.28% return.


LCTD

1D
3.15%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
1.14%
6M
5.65%
1Y
24.28%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
10Y*

NULC

1D
2.71%
1M
-4.85%
YTD
-3.28%
6M
-1.90%
1Y
16.57%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCTD vs. NULC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LCTD and NULC have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

LCTD vs. NULC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD
LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NULC
NULC Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
NULC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NULC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NULC Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
NULC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
NULC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. NULC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCTDNULCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.43

0.92

+0.51

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.00

1.41

+0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.20

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

1.51

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.08

6.75

+1.33

LCTD vs. NULC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the NULC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and NULC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCTDNULCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

0.92

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.68

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and NULC is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LCTD vs. NULC - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than NULC's 10.51% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.57%3.61%3.74%3.16%3.52%2.20%0.00%0.00%
NULC
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF
10.51%10.17%1.86%1.32%2.37%6.14%4.07%0.77%

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. NULC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum NULC drawdown of -34.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and NULC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCTDNULCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.82%

-34.86%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.92%

-11.34%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.95%

-6.44%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.91%

-6.43%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.53%

+0.35%

Volatility

LCTD vs. NULC - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) has a higher volatility of 7.53% compared to Nuveen ESG Large-Cap ETF (NULC) at 5.45%. This indicates that LCTD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NULC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCTDNULCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.53%

5.45%

+2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

10.13%

+0.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.08%

18.05%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.02%

16.83%

-0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.02%

19.83%

-3.81%