LCTD vs. KRBN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LCTD (BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF) and KRBN (KraneShares Global Carbon ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LCTD is a Alternative Energy Equities fund actively managed by BlackRock, while KRBN is a Commodities fund tracking the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index. LCTD is actively managed, while KRBN is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LCTD returned 7.39%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for KRBN. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LCTD charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for KRBN.

Performance

LCTD vs. KRBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly higher than KRBN's -4.32% return.

LCTD

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 7.66%
• 6M: 7.73%
• 1Y: 22.12%
• 3Y*: 15.68%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: —

KRBN

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 4.92%
• YTD: -4.32%
• 6M: -4.00%
• 1Y: 13.56%
• 3Y*: 0.90%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCTD vs. KRBN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	7.66%	30.42%	3.14%	17.10%	-16.16%	4.48%
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	-4.32%	23.11%	-13.56%	8.01%	-12.75%	74.29%

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and KRBN is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2021	0.24

Return for Risk

LCTD vs. KRBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCTD

LCTD Risk / Return Rank: 43
LCTD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
LCTD Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
LCTD Omega Ratio Rank: 42
LCTD Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
LCTD Martin Ratio Rank: 45

KRBN

KRBN Risk / Return Rank: 18
KRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
KRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
KRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 20
KRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
KRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCTD vs. KRBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LCTD	KRBN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	0.71	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	1.04	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.14	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	0.55	+1.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.16	1.39	+5.77

LCTD vs. KRBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the KRBN Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and KRBN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. KRBN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum KRBN drawdown of -36.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and KRBN.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCTD	KRBN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.82%	-36.42%	+6.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-24.98%	+14.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.59%	-27.34%	+13.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.82%	-36.42%	+6.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-12.78%	+10.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.76%	-16.12%	+9.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	9.76%	-6.66%

Volatility

LCTD vs. KRBN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is 4.38%, while KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that LCTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KRBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LCTD	KRBN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.38%	5.04%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.51%	16.81%	-4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	19.13%	-4.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.20%	28.05%	-11.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.08%	28.56%	-12.48%

LCTD vs. KRBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than KRBN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCTD vs. KRBN - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than KRBN's 1.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF	1.99%	1.90%	7.10%	7.60%	22.91%	0.49%
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF	3.37%	3.61%	3.74%	3.16%	3.52%	2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCTD and KRBN in my portfolio?

LCTD and KRBN have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LCTD or KRBN?

KRBN has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to LCTD (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCTD dropped -29.82% vs KRBN's -36.42%.

Which ETF is better, LCTD or KRBN?

On 5-year performance, LCTD leads with 7.39% vs 6.37% for KRBN. On fees, LCTD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, LCTD has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LCTD or KRBN?

Over the 5-year period, LCTD has performed better with a 7.39% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCTD or KRBN?

LCTD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for KRBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCTD or KRBN?

LCTD has the higher dividend yield at 3.37%, compared with 1.99% for KRBN.

What is the main difference between LCTD and KRBN?

LCTD is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while KRBN is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LCTD and 0.79% for KRBN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LCTD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.